|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 199, Issue 6 1277-1285, Copyright © 1996 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
GJ Ettema
Department of Anatomical Sciences, University of Queensland, Australia.
The aim of this study was to compare the contractile and series elastic properties of terrestrial mammals that use bipedal versus quadrupedal gaits. The gastrocnemius muscle of the hopping mouse (body mass 30.2 +/- 2.4 g, mean +/- S.D.) and the rat (313 +/- 10.7 g) were compared with data from the literature for the wallaby and the kangaroo rat to distinguish scaling effects and locomotion-related effects on muscle properties. Contractile length-force properties and series elastic stiffness were measured in situ during maximal tetanic contractions. The rat had a larger muscle-fibre-to-tendon-length ratio. The rat and hopping mouse showed similar normalised length-force characteristics of the gastrocnemius. Normalised stiffness in the hopping mouse was higher. The hopping mouse showed a higher capacity to store elastic energy per unit of contractile work capacity, as well as per unit of body mass. Accounting for body size differences, the rat had a smaller relative muscle mass and thus smaller work capacity than the three hopping animals considered. This is an agreement with a quadrupedal versus bipedal locomotion style. The differences in contractile and elastic properties of the gastrocnemius of the rat and hopping mouse seem to be closely related to locomotion patterns. Small animals seem to be able to utilise the storage and release of elastic energy to a far lesser extent than larger animals. However, even in animals as small as hopping mice, the storage and utilisation of elastic energy during locomotion is of functional significance and probably depends on locomotor behaviour.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. R. Lammers, K. D. Earls, and A. R. Biknevicius Locomotor kinetics and kinematics on inclines and declines in the gray short-tailed opossum Monodelphis domestica J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2006; 209(20): 4154 - 4166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. A. Huebsch, E. Kudryashova, C. M. Wooley, R. B. Sher, K. L. Seburn, M. J. Spencer, and G. A. Cox Mdm muscular dystrophy: interactions with calpain 3 and a novel functional role for titin's N2A domain Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2005; 14(19): 2801 - 2811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Lindstedt, T. E. Reich, P. Keim, and P. C. LaStayo Do muscles function as adaptable locomotor springs? J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2002; 205(15): 2211 - 2216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H. Marden and L. R. Allen Molecules, muscles, and machines: Universal performance characteristics of motors PNAS, April 2, 2002; 99(7): 4161 - 4166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Seyfarth, R Blickhan, and J. Van Leeuwen Optimum take-off techniques and muscle design for long jump J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2000; 203(4): 741 - 750. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Marden and L. R. Allen Molecules, muscles, and machines: Universal performance characteristics of motors PNAS, April 2, 2002; 99(7): 4161 - 4166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
