spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kasapi, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gosline, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kasapi, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gosline, J. M.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 199, Issue 5 1133-1146, Copyright © 1996 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Strain-rate-dependent mechanical properties of the equine hoof wall

MA Kasapi and JM Gosline
Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

The mechanical properties of fully hydrated equine hoof wall were examined at various loading rates in compact tension (CT) fracture, tensile and three-point bending dynamic tests to determine possible effects of hoof wall viscoelasticity on fracture toughness and tensile parameters. Four cross-head rates were used in CT tests: 1.7 x 10(-5), 1.7 x 10 (-3), 1.7 x 10(-2) and 2.5ms-1; four strain rates were used in tensile tests: 1.6 x 10(-3), 3.2 x 10(-2), 0.33 and 70s(-1). Speeds for the highest test rates were achieved using a large, custom-built impact pendulum. Bending test frequencies ranged from 0.04 to 200 Hz. In CT tests, both the initial modulus Ei and the stress intensity factor K rose with increasing strain rate (from 0.38 to 0.76 GPa for Ei and from 0.71 to 1.4 MN m-3/2 for K), whereas the fracture toughness parameter J remained constant at 12kJm-2. All tensile parameters except ultimate strain were sensitive to strain rate. Ei, total energy to breakage and maximum stress rose with increasing strain rate from 0.28 to 0.85 GPa, from 5.4 to 9.7 MJm-3 and from 17 to 31 MPa, respectively. Data from low-amplitude dynamic tests agreed well with Ei trends from CT and tensile tests. Direction of crack growth differed through the thickness of the wall, the pattern of which resembled a trilaminar ply. Although scanning electron microscopic examination of fracture surfaces revealed a decreasing pseudo-ductile behaviour with increasing strain rate, and ultimate tensile parameters are positively affected, equine hoof wall viscoelasticity does not appear to compromise fracture toughness at high strain rates.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. J. Mach, D. V. Nelson, and M. W. Denny
Techniques for predicting the lifetimes of wave-swept macroalgae: a primer on fracture mechanics and crack growth
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 210(13): 2213 - 2230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Kasapi and J. Gosline
Micromechanics of the equine hoof wall: optimizing crack control and material stiffness through modulation of the properties of keratin
J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 1999; 202(4): 377 - 391.
[Abstract] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1996