QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, A.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 199, Issue 4 949-958, Copyright © 1996 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Cephalopod sucker design and the physical limits to negative pressure

A Smith

Two factors determine the strength of pressure-based adhesive mechanisms such as suction: the magnitude of the pressure differential that their musculature and mechanics can produce and the pressure differential that water can sustain. This paper compares the adhesive strength of the primary cephalopod sucker types: the stalked suckers of decapods (cuttlefish and squid) and the unstalked suckers of octopods. These results are compared with the physical limits imposed by cavitation, the failure of water under negative pressure. The maximum pressure differentials that suckers can produce were measured using a wettable pressure transducer or by measuring their force of attachment on a wettable surface and dividing by the area exposed to reduced pressure. The maximum pressure differentials that water can sustain on a typical marine surface were measured in a Z-tube. Fifteen cephalopod species representing three orders were studied. At sea level, cavitation limits all suckers to the same range of pressure differentials (100-200 kPa), regardless of their morphology. As ambient pressure increases with depth, cavitation ceases to be limiting. In this case, stalked decapod suckers produce greater pressure differentials than unstalked octopod suckers. In addition, small suckers produce greater pressure differentials than large suckers. Suckers larger than 7.5 mm2, both decapod and octopod, typically achieve pressure differentials of 100 kPa. As their size decreases below 7.5 mm2, octopod suckers get slightly stronger, sometimes producing pressure differentials of 250-300 kPa, while decapod suckers get exponentially stronger, sometimes producing pressure differentials near 800 kPa. There were no differences in sucker strength among the four octopod species, but seven of the ten decapod species differed from the overall decapod regression curve. The strongest suckers belonged to the fast-swimming, open-water species in the decapod sub-order Oegopsida.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. N. Patek and R. L. Caldwell Extreme impact and cavitation forces of a biological hammer: strike forces of the peacock mantis shrimp Odontodactylus scyllarus J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2005; 208(19): 3655 - 3664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. Kier and A. M. Smith The Structure and Adhesive Mechanism of Octopus Suckers Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2002; 42(6): 1146 - 1153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Smith The Structure and Function of Adhesive Gels from Invertebrates Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2002; 42(6): 1164 - 1171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. K. Ellem, J. E. Furst, and K. D. Zimmerman Shell clamping behaviour in the limpet Cellana tramoserica J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2002; 205(4): 539 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]