spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, G.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 199, Issue 3 603-607, Copyright © 1996 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Brain and body oxygen requirements of Gnathonemus petersii, a fish with an exceptionally large brain

G Nilsson

Vertebrates have repeatedly been noted for having remarkably constant ratios of brain to body O2 consumption, the brain using 2-8 % of resting body O2 consumption, suggesting that evolution has put strict limits on the energetic cost of brain function. Only man, with a value of 20 %, is an exception to this rule. However, the results presented here suggest that, in the electric fish Gnathonemus petersii, the brain is responsible for approximately 60 % of body O2 consumption, a figure three times higher than that for any other vertebrate studied, including man. The exceptionally high energetic cost of the G. petersii brain appears to be a consequence both of the brain being very large and of the fish being ectothermic. It was also found that G. petersii has a high ability to utilise O2 at low levels. Thus, during falling [O2], this species was found to maintain both its O2 uptake and its electric discharge rate down to an ambient O2 level of 0.8 mg l-1 (at 26 &deg;C), although it was unable to tolerate an [O2] below 0.3 mg l-1. During severe hypoxia (<0.8 mg l-1), G. petersii attempted to gulp air from the water surface. These results establish a new record for the energetic cost of a vertebrate brain and they show that the species possessing such a brain has a high capacity for utilising O2 at very low ambient concentrations.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. E. Niven and S. B. Laughlin
Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2008; 211(11): 1792 - 1804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. E. Nilsson, J.-P. A. Hobbs, and S. Ostlund-Nilsson
Tribute to P. L. Lutz: respiratory ecophysiology of coral-reef teleosts
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2007; 210(10): 1673 - 1686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. E. Nilsson, J.-P. Hobbs, P. L. Munday, and S. Ostlund-Nilsson
Coward or braveheart: extreme habitat fidelity through hypoxia tolerance in a coral-dwelling goby
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2004; 207(1): 33 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
S. Schreiber, C. K. Machens, A. V. M. Herz, and S. B. Laughlin
Energy-Efficient Coding with Discrete Stochastic Events
Neural Comput., June 1, 2002; 14(6): 1323 - 1346.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1996