spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lowe, C.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 199, Issue 12 2605-2610, Copyright © 1996 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Kinematics and critical swimming speed of juvenile scalloped hammerhead sharks

C Lowe

Kinematics and critical swimming speed (Ucrit) of juvenile scalloped hammerhead sharks Sphyrna lewini were measured in a Brett-type flume (635 l). Kinematic parameters were also measured in sharks swimming in a large pond for comparison with those of sharks swimming in the flume. Sharks in the flume exhibited a mean Ucrit of 65±11 cm s-1 (± s.d.) or 1.17±0.21 body lengths per second (L s-1), which are similar to values for other species of sharks. In both the flume and pond, tailbeat frequency (TBF) and stride length (LS) increased linearly with increases in relative swimming speed (Urel=body lengths traveled per second). In the flume, tailbeat amplitude (TBA) decreased with increasing speed whereas TBA did not change with speed in the pond. Differences in TBF and LS between sharks swimming in the flume and the pond decreased with increases in Urel. Sharks swimming at slow speeds (e.g. 0.55 L s-1) in the pond had LS 19 % longer and TBF 21 % lower than sharks in the flume at the same Urel. This implies that sharks in the flume expended more energy while swimming at comparable velocities. Comparative measurements of swimming kinematics from sharks in the pond can be used to correct for effects of the flume on shark swimming kinematics and energetics.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. A. Sepulveda, N. C. Wegner, D. Bernal, and J. B. Graham
The red muscle morphology of the thresher sharks (family Alopiidae)
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2005; 208(22): 4255 - 4261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
L. Rosenberger
Pectoral fin locomotion in batoid fishes: undulation versus oscillation
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2001; 204(2): 379 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. Shadwick, S. Katz, K. Korsmeyer, T Knower, and J. Covell
Muscle dynamics in skipjack tuna: timing of red muscle shortening in relation to activation and body curvature during steady swimming
J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 1999; 202(16): 2139 - 2150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1996