spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibb, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gibb, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 199, Issue 10 2269-2283, Copyright © 1996 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

The kinematics of prey capture in Xystreurys liolepis: do all flatfish feed asymmetrically?

A Gibb

Previous research has shown that one species of flatfish displays several functional asymmetries of the head and jaws during prey capture. However, it is not known whether the functional asymmetries observed for this species are common to all flatfishes. In order to determine whether functional asymmetry is present in other flatfish taxa, prey-capture behavior was examined in a species of flatfish with little cephalic morphological asymmetry, Xystreurys liolepis (Pleuronectiformes: Paralichthyidae). In addition, X. liolepis is one of a few species of flatfish in which both typical (sinistral) and reversed (dextral) individuals are commonly found. Five individuals (two dextral and three sinistral) of X. liolepis were video-taped feeding at 250 fields s-1 in order to quantify prey-capture kinematics. These data were used to test two hypotheses: (1) that typical and reversed-symmetry individuals have identical prey-capture kinematics, and (2) that X. liolepis exhibit no functional asymmetry during prey capture because they have little morphological asymmetry. Analysis of prey capture indicates that the kinematic variables measured for sinistral and dextral individuals are statistically indistinguishable. In addition, X. liolepis do not exhibit the same suite of functional asymmetries that has been found in a flatfish species with more extreme cephalic morphological asymmetry (Pleuronichthys verticalis). However, asymmetrical anterior movement of the ventral portion of the maxilla does occur in X. liolepis during mouth opening. Examination of osteological preparations and cleared and stained individuals indicates that the maxilla is asymmetrical in length in this species. A simple model indicates that the differential length of the maxilla is sufficient to explain the observed functional asymmetry during prey capture. These results suggest that certain morphological asymmetries of the jaws of flatfishes are modifications for specialized prey-capture behaviors.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. J. Clark and A. P. Summers
Morphology and kinematics of feeding in hagfish: possible functional advantages of jaws
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2007; 210(22): 3897 - 3909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1996