QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bennett, A. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bennett, A. T.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 199, Issue 1 219-224, Copyright © 1996 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Do animals have cognitive maps?

AT Bennett
Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Adelaide, Australia.

Drawing on studies of humans, rodents, birds and arthropods, I show that 'cognitive maps' have been used to describe a wide variety of spatial concepts. There are, however, two main definitions. One, sensu Tolman, O'Keefe and Nadel, is that a cognitive map is a powerful memory of landmarks which allows novel short-cutting to occur. The other, sensu Gallistel, is that a cognitive map is any representation of space held by an animal. Other definitions with quite different meanings are also summarised. I argue that no animal has been conclusively shown to have a cognitive map, sensu Tolman, O'Keefe and Nadel, because simpler explanations of the crucial novel short-cutting results are invariably possible. Owing to the repeated inability of experimenters to eliminate these simpler explanations over at least 15 years, and the confusion caused by the numerous contradictory definitions of a cognitive map, I argue that the cognitive map is no longer a useful hypothesis for elucidating the spatial behaviour of animals and that use of the term should be avoided.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. J. Lohmann, C. M. F. Lohmann, and N. F. Putman Magnetic maps in animals: nature's GPS J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2007; 210(21): 3697 - 3705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Menzel and M. Giurfa Dimensions of cognition in an insect, the honeybee. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, March 1, 2006; 5(1): 24 - 40. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Menzel, U. Greggers, A. Smith, S. Berger, R. Brandt, S. Brunke, G. Bundrock, S. Hulse, T. Plumpe, F. Schaupp, et al. Honey bees navigate according to a map-like spatial memory PNAS, February 22, 2005; 102(8): 3040 - 3045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. J. Emery and N. S. Clayton The Mentality of Crows: Convergent Evolution of Intelligence in Corvids and Apes Science, December 10, 2004; 306(5703): 1903 - 1907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Cain and S. Malwal Landmark use and development of navigation behaviour in the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii (Mormyridae; Teleostei) J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2002; 205(24): 3915 - 3923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]