QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gallistel, C. R. Articles by Cramer, A. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gallistel, C. R. Articles by Cramer, A. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 199, Issue 1 211-217, Copyright © 1996 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Computations on metric maps in mammals: getting oriented and choosing a multi-destination route

CR Gallistel and AE Cramer
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles 90095, USA.

The capacity to construct a cognitive map is hypothesized to rest on two foundations: (1) dead reckoning (path integration); (2) the perception of the direction and distance of terrain features relative to the animal. A map may be constructed by combining these two sources of positional information, with the result that the positions of all terrain features are represented in the coordinate framework used for dead reckoning. When animals need to become reoriented in a mapped space, results from rats and human toddlers indicate that they focus exclusively on the shape of the perceived environment, ignoring non-geometric features such as surface colors. As a result, in a rectangular space, they are misoriented half the time even when the two ends of the space differ strikingly in their appearance. In searching for a hidden object after becoming reoriented, both kinds of subjects search on the basis of the object's mapped position in the space rather than on the basis of its relationship to a goal sign (e.g. a distinctive container or nearby marker), even though they have demonstrably noted the relationship between the goal and the goal sign. When choosing a multidestination foraging route, vervet monkeys look at least three destinations ahead, even though they are only capable of keeping a maximum of six destinations in mind at once.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. WIENER, M. LAFON, and A. BERTHOZ Path planning under spatial uncertainty Mem Cognit, April 1, 2008; 36(3): 495 - 504. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Ohashi, J. D. Thomson, and D. D'Souza Trapline foraging by bumble bees: IV. Optimization of route geometry in the absence of competition Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Winter and K. P. Stich Foraging in a complex naturalistic environment: capacity of spatial working memory in flower bats J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2005; 208(3): 539 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S. Etienne, R. Maurer, V. Boulens, A. Levy, and T. Rowe Resetting the path integrator: a basic condition for route-based navigation J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2004; 207(9): 1491 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Bell and D. Saucier Relationship among Environmental Pointing Accuracy, Mental Rotation, Sex, and Hormones Environment and Behavior, March 1, 2004; 36(2): 251 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. D. Hauser, N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve? Science, November 22, 2002; 298(5598): 1569 - 1579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. P. LaMendola and T. G. Bever Peripheral and Cerebral Asymmetries in the Rat Science, October 17, 1997; 278(5337): 483 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text]