spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wehner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Antonsen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wehner, R.
Right arrow Articles by Antonsen, P.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 199, Issue 1 141-146, Copyright © 1996 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information

R. Wehner, B. Michel and P. Antonsen

Social hymenopterans such as bees and ants are central-place foragers; they regularly depart from and return to fixed positions in their environment. In returning to the starting point of their foraging excursion or to any other point, they could resort to two fundamentally different ways of navigation by using either egocentric or geocentric systems of reference. In the first case, they would rely on information continuously collected en route (path integration, dead reckoning), i.e. integrate all angles steered and all distances covered into a mean home vector. In the second case, they are expected, at least by some authors, to use a map-based system of navigation, i.e. to obtain positional information by virtue of the spatial position they occupy within a larger environmental framework. In bees and ants, path integration employing a skylight compass is the predominant mechanism of navigation, but geocentred landmark-based information is used as well. This information is obtained while the animal is dead-reckoning and, hence, added to the vector course. For example, the image of the horizon skyline surrounding the nest entrance is retinotopically stored while the animal approaches the goal along its vector course. As shown in desert ants (genus Cataglyphis), there is neither interocular nor intraocular transfer of landmark information. Furthermore, this retinotopically fixed, and hence egocentred, neural snapshot is linked to an external (geocentred) system of reference. In this way, geocentred information might more and more complement and potentially even supersede the egocentred information provided by the path-integration system. In competition experiments, however, Cataglyphis never frees itself of its homeward-bound vector - its safety-line, so to speak - by which it is always linked to home. Vector information can also be transferred to a longer-lasting (higher-order) memory. There is no need to invoke the concept of the mental analogue of a topographic map - a metric map - assembled by the insect navigator. The flexible use of vectors, snapshots and landmark-based routes suffices to interpret the insect's behaviour. The cognitive-map approach in particular, and the representational paradigm in general, are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. G. Dyer, M. G. P. Rosa, and D. H. Reser
Honeybees can recognise images of complex natural scenes for use as potential landmarks
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2008; 211(8): 1180 - 1186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Pahl, H. Zhu, W. Pix, J. Tautz, and S. Zhang
Circadian timed episodic-like memory a bee knows what to do when, and also where
J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2007; 210(20): 3559 - 3567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Graham, V. Durier, and T. Collett
The co-activation of snapshot memories in wood ants
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2007; 210(12): 2128 - 2136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. Zhang, S. Schwarz, M. Pahl, H. Zhu, and J. Tautz
Honeybee memory: a honeybee knows what to do and when
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2006; 209(22): 4420 - 4428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Ismail, G. E. Robinson, and S. E. Fahrbach
Stimulation of muscarinic receptors mimics experience-dependent plasticity in the honey bee brain
PNAS, January 3, 2006; 103(1): 207 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. N. Fry and R. Wehner
Look and turn: landmark-based goal navigation in honey bees
J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2005; 208(20): 3945 - 3955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Dale, D. P. Harland, A. Manning-Jones, and T. S. Collett
Weak and strong priming cues in bumblebee contextual learning
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2005; 208(1): 65 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Fauria, K. Dale, M. Colborn, and T. S. Collett
Learning speed and contextual isolation in bumblebees
J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2002; 205(7): 1009 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Collett, D. Harland, and T. S. Collett
The use of landmarks and panoramic context in the performance of local vectors by navigating honeybees
J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2002; 205(6): 807 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
J. Rybak and R. Menzel
Integrative Properties of the Pe1 Neuron, a Unique Mushroom Body Output Neuron
Learn. Mem., May 1, 1998; 5(1): 133 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
R Wolf and M Heisenberg
Visual space from visual motion: turn integration in tethered flying Drosophila.
Learn. Mem., January 1, 1997; 4(4): 318 - 327.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1996