QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ritter, D. Articles by Nishikawa, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ritter, D. Articles by Nishikawa, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 198, Issue 9 2025-2040, Copyright © 1995 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

The kinematics and mechanism of prey capture in the African pig-nosed frog (Hemisus marmoratum): description of a radically divergent anuran tongue

D Ritter and K Nishikawa
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff 86011-5640, USA.

High-speed videography and muscle denervation experiments were used to quantify the feeding kinematics of Hemisus marmoratum and to test hypotheses of muscle function. The feeding behavior of H. marmoratum, which feeds on ants and termites, differs radically from that of other frogs that have been studied. During feeding in H. marmoratum, the tongue 'telescopes' straight out of the mouth, as opposed to the 'flipping' tongue trajectory observed in most other frogs. At the time of prey contact, two lateral lobes of tissue at the tongue tip envelop the prey. These lateral lobes are capable of applying significant pulling forces to the prey and the tongue is, therefore, described as prehensile. The trajectory of the tongue can be adjusted throughout protraction so that the frog can 'aim' its tongue in all three dimensions; distance, azimuth and elevation. Bilateral denervation of the genioglossus muscles results in a complete lack of tongue protraction, indicating that the genioglossus muscle is the main tongue protractor in H. marmoratum, as in other frogs. Thus, H. marmoratum provides strong evidence of functional conservatism of the genioglossus muscle within anurans. Bilateral denervation of the hyoglossus muscle indicates that although the hyoglossus is involved in several aspects of normal tongue retraction, including the prehensile capability of the tongue tip, it is not necessary for tongue retraction. Unilateral denervation of the genioglossus muscle causes significant deviation of the tongue towards the denervated side, providing evidence for a mechanism of lateral tongue aiming. On the basis of the kinematics of prey capture, the anatomy of the tongue and the results of the denervation experiments, we propose that H. marmoratum uses a hydraulic mechanism to protract its tongue.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Herrel, J. J. Meyers, J.-P. Timmermans, and K. C. Nishikawa Supercontracting muscle: producing tension over extreme muscle lengths J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2002; 205(15): 2167 - 2173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Deban and U Dicke Motor control of tongue movement during prey capture in plethodontid salamanders J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(24): 3699 - 3714. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Nishikawa, W. Kier, and K. Smith Morphology and mechanics of tongue movement in the African pig-nosed frog Hemisus marmoratum: a muscular hydrostatic model J. Exp. Biol., January 4, 1999; 202(7): 771 - 780. [Abstract] [PDF]