spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michelsen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rohrseitz, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michelsen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rohrseitz, K.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 198, Issue 9 1817-1827, Copyright © 1995 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Directional sound processing and interaural sound transmission in a small and a large grasshopper

A Michelsen and K Rohrseitz

Physical mechanisms involved in directional hearing are investigated in two species of short-horned grasshoppers that differ in body length by a factor of 3­4. The directional cues (the effects of the direction of sound incidence on the amplitude and phase angle of the sounds at the ears) are more pronounced in the larger animal, but the scaling is not simple. At high frequencies (10­20 kHz), the sound pressures at the ears of the larger species (Schistocerca gregaria) differ sufficiently to provide a useful directionality. In contrast, at low frequencies (3­5 kHz), the ears must be acoustically coupled and work as pressure difference receivers. At 3­5 kHz, the interaural sound transmission is approximately 0.5 (that is, when a tympanum is driven by a sound pressure of unit amplitude at its outer surface, the tympanum of the opposite ear receives a sound pressure with an amplitude of 0.5 through the interaural pathway). The interaural transmission decreases with frequency, and above 10 kHz it is only 0.1­0.2. It still has a significant effect on the directionality, however, because the directional cues are large. In the smaller species (Chorthippus biguttulus), the interaural sound transmission is also around 0.5 at 5 kHz, but the directionality is poor. The reason for this is not the modest directional cues, but rather the fact that the transmitted sound is not sufficiently delayed for the ear to exploit the directional cues. Above 7 kHz, the transmission increases to approximately 0.8 and the transmission delay increases; this allows the ear to become more directional, despite the still modest directional cues.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
T. Gollisch, H. Schutze, J. Benda, and A. V. M. Herz
Energy Integration Describes Sound-Intensity Coding in an Insect Auditory System
J. Neurosci., December 1, 2002; 22(23): 10434 - 10448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F Gilbert and N Elsner
Directional hearing of a grasshopper in the field
J. Exp. Biol., January 3, 2000; 203(6): 983 - 993.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A Michelsen and N Elsner
Sound emission and the acoustic far field of a singing acridid grasshopper (Omocestus viridulus L.)
J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 1999; 202(12): 1571 - 1577.
[Abstract]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J Schul, M Holderied, D. Helversen, and O. Helversen
Directional hearing in grasshoppers: neurophysiological testing of a bioacoustic model
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 1999; 202(2): 121 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PhysiologyHome page
A. Michelsen
The Tuned Cricket
Physiology, February 1, 1998; 13(1): 32 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1995