spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Full, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ahn, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Full, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ahn, A.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 198, Issue 6 1285-1298, Copyright © 1995 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Static forces and moments generated in the insect leg: comparison of a three-dimensional musculo-skeletal computer model with experimental measurements

R Full and A Ahn

As a first step towards the integration of information on neural control, biomechanics and isolated muscle function, we constructed a three-dimensional musculo-skeletal model of the hind leg of the death-head cockroach Blaberus discoidalis. We tested the model by measuring the maximum force generated in vivo by the hind leg of the cockroach, the coxa­femur joint angle and the position of this leg during a behavior, wedging, that was likely to require maximum torque or moment production. The product of the maximum force of the leg and its moment arm yielded a measured coxa­femur joint moment for wedging behavior. The maximum musculo-apodeme moment predicted by summing all extensor muscle moments in the model was adequate to explain the magnitude of the coxa­femur joint moment produced in vivo by the cockroach and occurred at the same joint angle measured during wedging. Active isometric muscle forces predicted from our model varied by 3.5-fold among muscles and by as much as 70 % with joint angle. Sums of active and passive forces varied by less than 3.5 % over the entire range of possible joint angles (0­125 °). Maximum musculo-apodeme moment arms varied nearly twofold among muscles. Moment arm lengths decreased to zero and switched to the opposite side of the center of rotation at joint angles within the normal range of motion. At large joint angles (>100 °), extensors acted as flexors. The effective mechanical advantage (musculo-apodeme moment arm/leg moment arm = 0.10) resulted in the six femoral extensor muscles of the model developing a summed force (1.4 N) equal to over 50 times the body weight. The model's three major force-producing extensor muscles attained 95 % of their maximum force, moment arm and moment at the joint angle used by the animal during wedging.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
J. R. Hutchinson, F. C. Anderson, S. S. Blemker, and S. L. Delp
Analysis of hindlimb muscle moment arms in Tyrannosaurus rex using a three-dimensional musculoskeletal computer model: implications for stance, gait, and speed
Paleobiology, December 1, 2005; 31(4): 676 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
W. J. Kargo and L. C. Rome
Functional morphology of proximal hindlimb muscles in the frog Rana pipiens
J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2002; 205(14): 1987 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. N. Ahn and R. J. Full
A motor and a brake: two leg extensor muscles acting at the same joint manage energy differently in a running insect
J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2002; 205(3): 379 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. Wootton
Invertebrate paraxial locomotory appendages: design, deformation and control
J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(23): 3333 - 3345.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1995