QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wang, X. T. Articles by Ker, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, X. T. Articles by Ker, R. F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 198, Issue 3 831-845, Copyright © 1995 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Creep rupture of wallaby tail tendons

XT Wang and RF Ker
Department of Pure and Applied Biology, The University, Leeds, UK.

The tail tendons from wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus) suffer creep rupture at stresses of 10 MPa or above, whereas their yield stress in a dynamic test is about 144 MPa. At stresses between 20 and 80 MPa, the time-to-rupture decreases exponentially with stress, but at 10 MPa, the lifetime is well above this exponential. For comparison, the stress on a wallaby tail tendon, when its muscle contracts isometrically, is about 13.5 MPa. Creep lifetime depends sharply on temperature and on specimen length, in contrast to strength and stiffness as observed in dynamic tests. The creep curve (strain versus time) can be considered as a combination of primary creep (decelerating strain) and tertiary creep (accelerating strain). Primary creep is non-damaging, but tertiary creep is accompanied by accumulating damage, with loss of stiffness and strength. 'Damage' is quantitatively defined as the fractional loss of stiffness. A creep theory is developed in which the whole of tertiary creep and, in particular, the creep lifetime are predicted from measurements made at the onset of creep, when the tendon is undamaged. This theory is based on a 'damage hypothesis', which can be stated as: damaged material no longer contributes to stiffness and strength, whereas intact material makes its full contribution to both.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Kongsgaard, P. Aagaard, M. Kjaer, and S. P. Magnusson Structural Achilles tendon properties in athletes subjected to different exercise modes and in Achilles tendon rupture patients J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2005; 99(5): 1965 - 1971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Gal Mammalian spinal biomechanics: postural support in seated macaques J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2002; 205(12): 1703 - 1707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Kubo, H. Kanehisa, M. Ito, and T. Fukunaga Effects of isometric training on the elasticity of human tendon structures in vivo J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2001; 91(1): 26 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. De Zee, F. Bojsen-Moller, and M. Voigt Dynamic viscoelastic behavior of lower extremity tendons during simulated running J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2000; 89(4): 1352 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Pike, R. Ker, and R. Alexander The development of fatigue quality in high- and low-stressed tendons of sheep (Ovis aries) J. Exp. Biol., January 7, 2000; 203(14): 2187 - 2193. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Ker, X. Wang, and A. Pike Fatigue quality of mammalian tendons J. Exp. Biol., January 4, 2000; 203(8): 1317 - 1327. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Ker The design of soft collagenous load-bearing tissues J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(23): 3315 - 3324. [Abstract] [PDF]