spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif Online submission spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Moffett, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Moffett, D.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 198, Issue 10 2115-2125, Copyright © 1995 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Electrophysiology of K+ transport by midgut epithelium of lepidopteran insect larvae. IV. A multicompartment model accounts for tetramethylammonium entry into goblet cavities

A Koch and D Moffett

A quantitative model was developed to explain the kinetics of tetramethylammonium (TMA+) movement into and out of the goblet cavities of posterior midgut cells of Manduca sexta based on the data of the accompanying paper, which indicated that TMA+ does not enter the goblet cavity directly from the lumen. The model has two cellular compartments between the lumen and goblet cavity; these have been tentatively identified as the columnar cell and goblet cell cytoplasm. Five transmembrane pathways are included: from lumen to columnar cell, from columnar cell to goblet cell, from goblet cell cytoplasm to goblet cell cavity, and across the basal membrane of each cell type. These pathways need not be channels; they could use endocytotic or exocytotic mechanisms or, in the case of the cell-to-cell passage, septate junctions. However, in all cases, transfer is proportional to the electrochemical gradient. The model was tested against the results obtained after exposure to TMA+ in short-circuited and open-circuited tissues as well as results from an open-circuited tissue that did not develop a large transepithelial potential. Although driving forces for TMA+ across the membrane barriers were quite different in the different experimental conditions, the transfer coefficients from lumen to columnar cell, from columnar to goblet cell and from both cells across the basal membrane were the same. The only transfer coefficient that changed between short-circuit and open-circuit conditions was that from goblet cell cytoplasm to goblet cavity. This value was high under short-circuit conditions (when K+ transport activity is high), but low under open-circuit conditions (when K+ transport activity is low). The model suggests a hypothesis in which TMA+ enters the goblet cavity by an indirect route across the cell membrane of columnar cells, and thence passes to the goblet cell cytoplasm through intercellular junctions. Results from experiments with cytochalasin E suggest that the actin-based cytoskeleton is involved in limiting cell­cell coupling. In this model, TMA+ passes from the goblet cell cytoplasm to the goblet cavity via the K+/nH+ antiport believed to mediate active transepithelial K+ transport. However, although actively transported K+ is believed to pass from goblet cavity to lumen, TMA+ cannot.




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1995