|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 197, Issue 1 215-235, Copyright © 1994 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
RS Edgecomb, CE Harth and AM Schneiderman
Section of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2702.
The regulation of feeding behavior in adult Drosophila melanogaster includes such elements as ingestion responsiveness, volume ingested in a single meal, food storage in the crop and rate of defecation. Our results suggest that feeding behavior varies in a manner dependent on feeding regime (food-deprived or ad-libitum-fed) and nutritional state. Fed flies that are subsequently food-deprived become increasingly more responsive to food stimuli over time and, when offered 1% agar diets containing different concentrations of sucrose, ingest greater amounts of diets that have higher sucrose concentrations. When fed ad libitum for 72 h on these same diets, D. melanogaster maintained much smaller crops on average than food-deprived flies fed a single meal. Additionally, ad-libitum-fed flies are grouped into two categories depending on the concentration of sucrose in the diet. Flies fed for 72 h on 1% agar diets having 50 mmoll-1 sucrose or more are not affected by the concentration of sucrose in the diet, while flies fed on diets of 15 or 25 mmoll-1 sucrose increase ingestion responsiveness, crop size and the rate of defecation with decreasing concentrations of sucrose in the diet. Flies fed on even lower sucrose concentrations (5 or 10 mmoll-1 sucrose) for 27-72 h exhibit both a shift over time to larger crop sizes and increased mortality over those of flies fed 15 mmoll-1 sucrose. These data suggest that flies fed ad libitum are capable of modulating their feeding behavior in response to their nutritional state.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. M. Bass, R. C. Grandison, R. Wong, P. Martinez, L. Partridge, and M. D. W. Piper Optimization of Dietary Restriction Protocols in Drosophila J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., October 1, 2007; 62(10): 1071 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Simpson and D. Raubenheimer Caloric Restriction and Aging Revisited: The Need for a Geometric Analysis of the Nutritional Bases of Aging J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., July 1, 2007; 62(7): 707 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. Ja, G. B. Carvalho, E. M. Mak, N. N. de la Rosa, A. Y. Fang, J. C. Liong, T. Brummel, and S. Benzer Prandiology of Drosophila and the CAFE assay PNAS, May 15, 2007; 104(20): 8253 - 8256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Meunier, Y. H. Belgacem, and J.-R. Martin Regulation of feeding behaviour and locomotor activity by takeout in Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1424 - 1434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-S. Lee, K.-H. You, J.-K. Choo, Y.-M. Han, and K. Yu Drosophila Short Neuropeptide F Regulates Food Intake and Body Size J. Biol. Chem., December 3, 2004; 279(49): 50781 - 50789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||