QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnsen, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Johnsen, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 195, Issue 1 281-291, Copyright © 1994 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Extraocular sensitivity to polarized light in an echinoderm

S Johnsen
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-3280.

This study tests the hypotheses that the birefringent calcite and stereom structure of the brittlestar (Ophiuroidea, Echinodermata) endoskeleton polarizes light and that certain brittlestars respond to polarized light. The first hypothesis was tested in Ophioderma brevispinum by examining ossicles from freshly killed specimens under polarized light. This analysis revealed that the lateral arm shields, oral arm shields, arm spines and aboral disk ossicles are dichroic and thus polarize light. The second hypothesis was tested in two orientation experiments under polarized light. The results from the first orientation experiment showed (1) that, under polarized light, animals oriented significantly and unimodally, (2) that, under polarized light with the e-vector perpendicular to that in 1, animals oriented significantly and unimodally to within 18 degrees of the bearing of the animals in 1, and (3) that, under unpolarized light, animals did not orient significantly. The results from the second orientation experiment showed that, under polarized light, animals oriented significantly and unimodally to within 17 degrees of an individual preference previously established under polarized light; but under unpolarized light, animals did not orient significantly to an individual preference established under polarized light. Thus, O. brevispinum orients under polarized, but not unpolarized, light. The unimodal orientation and lack of consistent alignment with the e-vector suggest that polarized light is not used as a directional cue but instead as a signal to sustain oriented behavior. The dichroism of the ossicles of O. brevispinum and the animal's capacity (though eyeless) to discriminate between polarized and unpolarized light suggest that the mechanism of polarization sensitivity may rely on polarizing filters built from the animal's skeleton.
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. M. Mathger, N. Shashar, and R. T. Hanlon Do cephalopods communicate using polarized light reflections from their skin? J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2009; 212(14): 2133 - 2140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Douglas, T. W. Cronin, T.-H. Chiou, and N. J. Dominy Light habitats and the role of polarized iridescence in the sensory ecology of neotropical nymphalid butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2007; 210(5): 788 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Blevins and S. Johnsen Spatial vision in the echinoid genus Echinometra J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2004; 207(24): 4249 - 4253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]