spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loudon, C.
Right arrow Articles by Koehl, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loudon, C.
Right arrow Articles by Koehl, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 193, Issue 1 233-254, Copyright © 1994 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

WHEN DOES MOTION RELATIVE TO NEIGHBORING SURFACES ALTER THE FLOW THROUGH ARRAYS OF HAIRS?

C Loudon, B Best and M Koehl

Many animals from different phyla use structures bearing arrays of hairs to perform a variety of important functions, such as olfaction, gas exchange, suspension feeding and locomotion. The performance of all these functions depends on the motion of water or air around and through these arrays of hairs. Because organisms often move such hair-bearing appendages with respect to their bodies or the substratum, we assessed the effects of such motion relative to walls on the fluid flow between neighboring hairs. We compared flow fields near dynamically scaled physical models of hairs moving near walls with those calculated for such hairs in an unbounded fluid. Our results suggest that the methods an organism can use to change the flow through a hair-bearing appendage differ with Reynolds number (based on hair diameter). When Re is 10(-2) or below, changing speed does not alter the proportion of the fluid that moves through rather than around the array, whereas moving relative to a wall increases it. In contrast, when Re is between 10(-2) and 1, changes in speed have a big effect on the proportion of fluid moving through the array, while moving near walls makes little difference.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. C. Ferner and B. Gaylord
Flexibility foils filter function: structural limitations on suspension feeding
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2008; 211(22): 3563 - 3572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. A. Reidenbach, N. George, and M. A. R. Koehl
Antennule morphology and flicking kinematics facilitate odor sampling by the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2008; 211(17): 2849 - 2858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
M.A.R. Koehl
The Fluid Mechanics of Arthropod Sniffing in Turbulent Odor Plumes
Chem Senses, February 1, 2006; 31(2): 93 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. S. Mead, M. B. Wiley, M. A. R. Koehl, and J. R. Koseff
Fine-scale patterns of odor encounter by the antennules of mantis shrimp tracking turbulent plumes in wave-affected and unidirectional flow
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2003; 206(1): 181 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. A. Goldman and S. N. Patek
Two sniffing strategies in palinurid lobsters
J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2002; 205(24): 3891 - 3902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
J. A. Walker
Functional Morphology and Virtual Models: Physical Constraints on the Design of Oscillating Wings, Fins, Legs, and Feet at Intermediate Reynolds Numbers
Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2002; 42(2): 232 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
J.A. Goldman and M.A.R. Koehl
Fluid Dynamic Design of Lobster Olfactory Organs: High Speed Kinematic Analysis of Antennule Flicking by Panulirus argus
Chem Senses, May 1, 2001; 26(4): 385 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. Mead and M. Koehl
Stomatopod antennule design: the asymmetry, sampling efficiency and ontogeny of olfactory flicking
J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 2000; 203(24): 3795 - 3808.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C Loudon and M. Koehl
Sniffing by a silkworm moth: wing fanning enhances air penetration through and pheromone interception by antennae
J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2000; 203(19): 2977 - 2990.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1994