|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 192, Issue 1 179-206, Copyright © 1994 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
M Dickinson
The downstroke-to-upstroke transition of many insects is characterized by rapid wing rotation. The aerodynamic consequences of these rapid changes in angle of attack have been investigated using a mechanical model dynamically scaled to the Reynolds number appropriate for the flight of small insects such as Drosophila. Several kinematic parameters of the wing flip were examined, including the speed and axis of rotation, as well as the duration and angle of attack during the wing stroke preceding rotation. Alteration of these kinematic parameters altered force generation during the subsequent stroke in a variety of ways. 1. When the rotational axis was close to the trailing edge, the model wing could capture vorticity generated during rotation and greatly increase aerodynamic performance. This vortex capture was most clearly manifested by the generation of lift at an angle of attack of 0°. Lift at a 0° angle of attack was also generated following rotation about the leading edge, but only if the downstroke angle was large enough to generate a von Karman street. The lift may be due to an alteration in the effective angle of attack caused by the inter-vortex stream in the downstroke wake. 2. The maximum lift attained (over all angles of attack) was substantially elevated if the wing translated backwards through a wake generated by the previous stroke. Transient lift coefficient values of nearly 4 were obtained when the wing translated back through a von Karman street generated at a 76.5° angle of attack. This effect might also be explained by the influence of the inter-vortex stream, which contributes a small component to fluid velocity in the direction of translation. 3. The growth of lift with angle of attack was significantly elevated following a 7.5 chord stroke with a 76.5° angle of attack, although it was relatively constant under all other kinematic conditions. 4. The results also indicate the discrepancies between transient and time-averaged measures of performance that arise when unsteady mechanisms are responsible for force generation. Although the influence of wing rotation was strong during the first few chords of translation, averaging the performance over as little as 6.5 chords of motion greatly attenuated the effects of rotation. 5. Together, these modeling results suggest that the unsteady mechanisms generated by simple wing flips could provide an important source for the production of aerodynamic forces in insect flight. Furthermore, the extreme sensitivity to small variations in almost all kinematic parameters could provide a foundation for understanding the aerodynamic mechanisms underlying active flight control.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Lentink, F. T. Muijres, F. J. Donker-Duyvis, and J. L. van Leeuwen Vortex-wake interactions of a flapping foil that models animal swimming and flight J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 267 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Sane Induced airflow in flying insects I. A theoretical model of the induced flow J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2006; 209(1): 32 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.-O. Lehmann, S. P. Sane, and M. Dickinson The aerodynamic effects of wing-wing interaction in flapping insect wings J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2005; 208(16): 3075 - 3092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Miller and C. S. Peskin A computational fluid dynamics of `clap and fling' in the smallest insects J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2005; 208(2): 195 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. B. Dickson and M. H. Dickinson The effect of advance ratio on the aerodynamics of revolving wings J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2004; 207(24): 4269 - 4281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Miller and C. S. Peskin When vortices stick: an aerodynamic transition in tiny insect flight J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(17): 3073 - 3088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Sane The aerodynamics of insect flight J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4191 - 4208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sun and J. H. Wu Aerodynamic force generation and power requirements in forward flight in a fruit fly with modeled wing motion J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 3065 - 3083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Birch and M. H. Dickinson The influence of wing-wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2003; 206(13): 2257 - 2272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sun and J. Tang Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2002; 205(1): 55 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Sane and M. H. Dickinson The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 2001; 204(15): 2607 - 2626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. H. Dickinson, F. Lehmann, and S. P. Sane Wing Rotation and the Aerodynamic Basis of Insect Flight Science, June 18, 1999; 284(5422): 1954 - 1960. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Drucker and G. Lauder Locomotor forces on a swimming fish: three-dimensional vortex wake dynamics quantified using digital particle image velocimetry J. Exp. Biol., January 9, 1999; 202(18): 2393 - 2412. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
