spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cutts, C.
Right arrow Articles by Speakman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cutts, C.
Right arrow Articles by Speakman, J.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 189, Issue 1 251-261, Copyright © 1994 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

ENERGY SAVINGS IN FORMATION FLIGHT OF PINK-FOOTED GEESE

C Cutts and J Speakman

Fifty-four skeins of pink-footed geese (Anser brachyrhynchus) were photographed from directly underneath to eliminate the effects of perspective distortion, and the wing-tip spacings (the distance between adjacent birds' wing tips perpendicular to the flight path at maximum wingspan) and depths (the distance between adjacent birds' body centres parallel to the flight path) were measured at the same time as local wind speeds. The photographs were used to test for savings in induced power from wing positioning relative to the predicted positions of vortices generated by other wings, using a theoretical model. The mean wing-tip spacing corresponded to a saving in induced power of 14 %, less than one-third of the maximum possible. The saving in total power might be as low as 2.4 %. The high variation in wing-tip spacing suggests that pink-footed geese found difficulty maintaining position and thus adopted a strategy of flying outboard of the optimal position that maximises savings. This may minimise the risk of straying into a zone where savings are negative. There was a significant correlation between depth and wing-tip spacing, supporting an alternative communication hypothesis, whereby the birds position themselves to obtain maximum information on their neighbour's position. In high winds, there was little change in wing-tip spacing variation but a decrease in depth variation, suggesting a shift towards more regularly spaced skeins.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
W. L. Romey and E. Galbraith
Optimal group positioning after a predator attack: the influence of speed, sex, and satiation within mobile whirligig swarms
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 338 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. Andersson and J. Wallander
Kin selection and reciprocity in flight formation?
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 158 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Maina
What it takes to fly: the structural and functional respiratory refinements in birds and bats
J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2000; 203(20): 3045 - 3064.
[Abstract]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1994