spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Withers, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pang, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Withers, P.
Right arrow Articles by Pang, T. S.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 188, Issue 1 175-189, Copyright © 1994 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

ROLE OF UREA AND METHYLAMINES IN BUOYANCY OF ELASMOBRANCHS

P Withers, G Hefter and TS Pang

The possible role of urea and trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) in providing positive buoyancy has been examined for elasmobranch fishes. TMAO has a considerably lower density than an equimolar solution of urea, and solutions of both TMAO and urea are considerably less dense than equimolar solutions of most other body fluid solutes. The body fluid composition of three elasmobranchs, the whiskery shark Furgaleus ventralis, the black whaler shark Carcharhinus obscurus and the shovelnosed ray Aptychotremata vincentiana, is typical for marine elasmobranchs, with plasma concentrations of about 260 mmol l-1 Na+, 250 mmol l-1 Cl-, 340 mmol l-1 urea and 70 mmol l-1 trimethylamine oxide. A plasma density of 1.015 was calculated for the whaler shark (from the concentrations, relative molecular masses and absolute molal volumes of plasma solutes), which would contribute a positive lift of 8.45 g l-1. There is a large positive contribution to buoyancy by urea (3.7 g l-1), trimethylamine oxide (1.8 g l-1) and Cl- (4.0 g l-1), whereas slight negative buoyancy is conferred by Na+ (-0.8 g l-1). Divalent cations (Ca2+, Mg2+) contribute minimal negative buoyancy (about -0.1 g l-1 each) despite their rather negative partial molal volumes, because of their low concentrations. Muscle fluids contain about 40 mmol l-1 Cl-, 365 mmol l-1 urea, 160 mmol l-1 trimethylamine oxide, 16 mmol l-1 betaine and 69 mmol l-1 sarcosine. The organic solutes contribute about 12.1 g l-1 lift. Although urea and TMAO act as balancing osmolytes, and TMAO as a counteracting solute, a positive buoyancy role must be considered as a further adaptive function of urea and TMAO accumulation in chondrichthyean fishes.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. R. Treberg and W. R. Driedzic
Maintenance and accumulation of trimethylamine oxide by winter skate (Leucoraja ocellata): reliance on low whole animal losses rather than synthesis
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): R1790 - R1798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. R. Treberg, B. Speers-Roesch, P. M. Piermarini, Y. K. Ip, J. S. Ballantyne, and W. R. Driedzic
The accumulation of methylamine counteracting solutes in elasmobranchs with differing levels of urea: a comparison of marine and freshwater species
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2006; 209(5): 860 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1994