spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cech, S
Right arrow Articles by Cheer, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cech, S
Right arrow Articles by Cheer, A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 186, Issue 1 145-156, Copyright © 1994 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

PADDLEFISH BUCCAL FLOW VELOCITY DURING RAM SUSPENSION FEEDING AND RAM VENTILATION

S Cech and A Cheer

A micro-thermistor probe was inserted into the buccal cavity of freely swimming paddlefish to measure flow velocity during ram ventilation, ram suspension feeding and prey processing. Swimming speed was measured from videotapes recorded simultaneously with the buccal flow velocity measurements. Both swimming velocity and buccal flow velocity were significantly higher during suspension feeding than during ram ventilation. As the paddlefish shifted from ventilation to feeding, buccal flow velocity increased to approximately 60 % of the swimming velocity. During prey processing, buccal flow velocity was significantly higher than the swimming velocity, indicating that prey processing involves the generation of suction. The Reynolds number (Re) for flow at the level of the paddlefish gill rakers during feeding is about 30, an order of magnitude lower than the Re calculated previously for pump suspension-feeding blackfish. These data, combined with data available from the literature, indicate that the gill rakers of ram suspension-feeding teleost fishes may operate at a substantially lower Re than the rakers of pump suspension feeders.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Humphries
Filter feeders and plankton increase particle encounter rates through flow regime control
PNAS, May 12, 2009; 106(19): 7882 - 7887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
J. C. Smith and S. L. Sanderson
Intra-Oral Flow Patterns and Speeds in a Suspension-Feeding Fish With Gill Rakers Removed Versus Intact
Biol. Bull., December 1, 2008; 215(3): 309 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. P. J. Sanford and P. C. Wainwright
Use of sonomicrometry demonstrates the link between prey capture kinematics and suction pressure in largemouth bass
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2002; 205(22): 3445 - 3457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
L. Wilkens, B Wettring, E Wagner, W Wojtenek, and D Russell
Prey detection in selective plankton feeding by the paddlefish: is the electric sense sufficient?
J. Exp. Biol., January 4, 2001; 204(8): 1381 - 1389.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1994