spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, A. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 183, Issue 1 35-60, Copyright © 1993 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

COLLISION AVOIDANCE OF FLYING LOCUSTS: STEERING TORQUES AND BEHAVIOUR

R. M. Robertson and A. G. Johnson

1. Obstacles approaching in the flight path trigger postural and wing kinematic adjustments in tethered flying locusts. We sought to confirm that these behaviours were steering behaviours by measuring the changes in the flight forces associated with their execution. We also investigated the coordination of these behaviours in the execution of collision avoidance manoeuvres and the effect of speed or size of the obstacle on the timing and magnitude of the response. 2. Locusts were tethered and suspended in a wind tunnel from orthogonally arranged leaf springs mounted with strain gauges. Lift and yaw torque could be monitored unambiguously. We also monitored a forward translation force which combined pitch and thrust. During flight, the locusts were videotaped from behind while targets of different sizes (5 cmx5 cm, 7 cmx7 cm, 9 cmx9cm, 11 cmx11 cm) were transported towards the head at different speeds (1, 2, 3 or 4 m s-1). 3. Angular asymmetry of the forewings during the downstroke with the right forewing high, and abdomen and hindleg movement to the left, were temporally associated with an increase in yaw torque to the left. With the left forewing high, abdomen and hindleg movement to the right were temporally associated with a decrease in yaw torque to the left. Obstacle avoidance behaviours could be associated with either an increase or a decrease in the pitch/thrust component. 4. Leg, abdomen and wingbeat alterations in response to the approach of an obstacle were independent but tightly coordinated. Slower approaches increased the magnitude of the responses. However, the size of the obstacle had no effect on the magnitude of the response. Slower and larger targets generated earlier reactions (i.e. locusts reacted when the targets were further from the head). 5. We conclude that the behaviours we have described were steering behaviours which would have directed the animal around an obstacle in its flight path, and that there were at least two strategies for collision avoidance associated with slowing or speeding flight. Leg, abdomen and wingbeat alterations formed a coherent avoidance response, the magnitude of which was dependent upon the time available for it to develop. We further conclude that the manoeuvre was not initiated at a constant time to collision and we propose that the avoidance strategy was to initiate the manoeuvre when the targets subtended more than 10 s in the insect's field of view.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. Garm, M. O'Connor, L. Parkefelt, and D.-E. Nilsson
Visually guided obstacle avoidance in the box jellyfish Tripedalia cystophora and Chiropsella bronzie
J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2007; 210(20): 3616 - 3623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. D. Santer, F. C. Rind, R. Stafford, and P. J. Simmons
Role of an Identified Looming-Sensitive Neuron in Triggering a Flying Locust's Escape
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3391 - 3400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. G. A. Money, M. L. Anstey, and R. M. Robertson
Heat Stress-Mediated Plasticity in a Locust Looming-Sensitive Visual Interneuron
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2005; 93(4): 1908 - 1919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Matheson, S. M. Rogers, and H. G. Krapp
Plasticity in the Visual System Is Correlated With a Change in Lifestyle of Solitarious and Gregarious Locusts
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 1 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. A. Frye
Effects of stretch receptor ablation on the optomotor control of lift in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta
J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2001; 204(21): 3683 - 3691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. P. Sane and M. H. Dickinson
The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production
J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 2001; 204(15): 2607 - 2626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
F. Gabbiani, H. G. Krapp, and G. Laurent
Computation of Object Approach by a Wide-Field, Motion-Sensitive Neuron
J. Neurosci., February 1, 1999; 19(3): 1122 - 1141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Camhi and E. Johnson
High-frequency steering maneuvers mediated by tactile cues: antennal wall-following in the cockroach
J. Exp. Biol., January 3, 1999; 202(5): 631 - 643.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1993