spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norberg, U.
Right arrow Articles by von Helversen, O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norberg, U.
Right arrow Articles by von Helversen, O

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 182, Issue 1 207-227, Copyright © 1993 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

The cost of hovering and forward flight in a nectar-feeding bat, Glossophaga soricina, estimated from aerodynamic theory

UM Norberg, TH Kunz, JF Steffensen, Y Winter and O von Helversen
Department of Zoology, Zoomorphology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Energy expenditure during flight in animals can best be understood and quantified when both theoretical and empirical approaches are used concurrently. This paper examines one of four methods that we have used to estimate the cost of flight in a neotropical nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina (Phyllostomidae), namely the use of kinematic and morphological data and aerodynamic theory to estimate the mechanical power requirements (power output) for hovering and horizontal forward flight. A hot-wire anemometer was used to measure induced velocity (the velocity of air accelerated by the wings) during hovering in order to estimate induced power. Our estimate of aerodynamic power (the sum of induced, profile and parasite powers) required for a 0.0105 kg G. soricina to hover is 0.15 W and our estimate of the inertial power (the power required to oscillate the wings) is 0.19 W. Thus, the total mechanical power for hovering is 0.34 W or 32.4 W kg-1. The mechanical power required for horizontal forward flight, near the minimum power flight speed (4.2 ms-1) for a 0.0117 kg bat is 0.14 W (12.3 W kg-1), of which 0.10 W is aerodynamic power and 0.042 W is inertial power. Comparison with our results on metabolic power requirements estimated from nectar intake gives a mechanical efficiency of 0.15 for hovering flight and 0.11 for forward flight near the minimum power speed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
K. C. Welch Jr, L. G. Herrera M., and R. K. Suarez
Dietary sugar as a direct fuel for flight in the nectarivorous bat Glossophaga soricina
J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2008; 211(3): 310 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. P. Sane and N. P. Jacobson
Induced airflow in flying insects II. Measurement of induced flow
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2006; 209(1): 43 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. Ward, U. Moller, J. M. V. Rayner, D. M. Jackson, W. Nachtigall, and J. R. Speakman
Metabolic power of European starlings Sturnus vulgaris during flight in a wind tunnel, estimated from heat transfer modelling, doubly labelled water and mask respirometry
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2004; 207(24): 4291 - 4298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. R. Usherwood, T. L. Hedrick, and A. A. Biewener
The aerodynamics of avian take-off from direct pressure measurements in Canada geese (Branta canadensis)
J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2003; 206(22): 4051 - 4056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. Dudley and Y. Winter
Hovering flight mechanics of neotropical flower bats (Phyllostomidae: Glossophaginae) in normodense and hypodense gas mixtures
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2002; 205(23): 3669 - 3677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. D. Bullen and N. L. McKenzie
Scaling bat wingbeat frequency and amplitude
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2002; 205(17): 2615 - 2626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. N. Askew, R. L. Marsh, and C. P. Ellington
The mechanical power output of the flight muscles of blue-breasted quail (Coturnix chinensis) during take-off
J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2001; 204(21): 3601 - 3619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. Ward, U. Moller, J. M. V. Rayner, D. M. Jackson, D. Bilo, W. Nachtigall, and J. R. Speakman
Metabolic power, mechanical power and efficiency during wind tunnel flight by the European starling Sturnus vulgaris
J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2001; 204(19): 3311 - 3322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
U. Lindhe-Norberg, A. Brooke, and W. Trewhella
Soaring and non-soaring bats of the family pteropodidae (flying foxes, Pteropus spp.): wing morphology and flight performance
J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2000; 203(3): 651 - 664.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
Y Winter
Flight speed and body mass of nectar-feeding bats (Glossophaginae) during foraging
J. Exp. Biol., January 7, 1999; 202(14): 1917 - 1930.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S Ward, J. Rayner, U MOLler, D. Jackson, W Nachtigall, and J. Speakman
Heat transfer from starlings sturnus vulgaris during flight
J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 1999; 202(12): 1589 - 1602.
[Abstract]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1993