|
|
|
|||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 182, Issue 1 147-171, Copyright © 1993 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
MW Westneat, JH Long, W Hoese and S Nowicki
Department of Zoology, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605.
The movements of the head and beak of songbirds may play a functional role in vocal production by influencing the acoustic properties of songs. We investigated this possibility by synchronously measuring the acoustic frequency and amplitude and the kinematics (beak gape and head angle) of singing behavior in the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis) and the swamp sparrow (Melospiza georgiana). These birds are closely related emberizine sparrows, but their songs differ radically in frequency and amplitude structure. We found that the acoustic frequencies of notes in a song have a consistent, positive correlation with beak gape in both species. Beak gape increased significantly with increasing frequency during the first two notes in Z. albicollis song, with a mean frequency for note 1 of 3 kHz corresponding to a gape of 0.4 cm (a 15 degrees gape angle) and a mean frequency for note 2 of 4 kHz corresponding to a gape of 0.7 cm (a 30 degrees gape angle). The relationship between gape and frequency for the upswept third note in Z. albicollis also was significant. In M. georgiana, low frequencies of 3 kHz corresponding to beak gapes of 0.2-0.3 cm (a 10-15 degrees break angle), whereas frequencies of 7-8 kHz were associated with flaring of the beak to over 1 cm (a beak angle greater than 50 degrees). Beak gape and song amplitude are poorly correlated in both species. We conclude that cranial kinematics, particularly beak movements, influence the resonance properties of the vocal tract by varying its physical dimensions and thus play an active role in the production of birdsong.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Schmidt, H. P. Kunc, V. Amrhein, and M. Naguib Aggressive responses to broadband trills are related to subsequent pairing success in nightingales Behav. Ecol., February 27, 2008; (2008) arn021v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Patek, B. N. Nowroozi, J. E. Baio, R. L. Caldwell, and A. P. Summers Linkage mechanics and power amplification of the mantis shrimp's strike J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2007; 210(20): 3677 - 3688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Laiolo, D. Serrano, J. L. Tella, M. Carrete, G. Lopez, and C. Navarro Distress calls reflect poxvirus infection in lesser short-toed lark Calandrella rufescens Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2007; 18(3): 507 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Riede, R. A. Suthers, N. H. Fletcher, and W. E. Blevins Songbirds tune their vocal tract to the fundamental frequency of their song PNAS, April 4, 2006; 103(14): 5543 - 5548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Nelson, G. J. L. Beckers, and R. A. Suthers Vocal tract filtering and sound radiation in a songbird J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2005; 208(2): 297 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Riede, G. J. L. Beckers, W. Blevins, and R. A. Suthers Inflation of the esophagus and vocal tract filtering in ring doves J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2004; 207(23): 4025 - 4036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. WILLIAMS Birdsong and Singing Behavior Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., June 1, 2004; 1016(1): 1 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J M. WILD Functional Neuroanatomy of the Sensorimotor Control of Singing Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., June 1, 2004; 1016(1): 438 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. NOWICKI and W. A. SEARCY Song Function and the Evolution of Female Preferences: Why Birds Sing, Why Brains Matter Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., June 1, 2004; 1016(1): 704 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Podos, J. A. Southall, and M. R. Rossi-Santos Vocal mechanics in Darwin's finches: correlation of beak gape and song frequency J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2004; 207(4): 607 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ballentine, J. Hyman, and S. Nowicki Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 163 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Franz and F. Goller Respiratory patterns and oxygen consumption in singing zebra finches J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2003; 206(6): 967 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Williams Choreography of song, dance and beak movements in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) J. Exp. Biol., March 12, 2002; 204(20): 3497 - 3506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Hoese, J Podos, N. Boetticher, and S Nowicki Vocal tract function in birdsong production: experimental manipulation of beak movements J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 2000; 203(12): 1845 - 1855. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Riede and T Fitch Vocal tract length and acoustics of vocalization in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 1999; 202(20): 2859 - 2867. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||