spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eilam, D.
Right arrow Articles by Shefer, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eilam, D.
Right arrow Articles by Shefer, G.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 173, Issue 1 155-163, Copyright © 1992 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Reversal of interleg coupling in backward locomotion implies a prime role of the direction of locomotion

D Eilam and G Shefer
Canadian Center for Ecological Zoology, Department of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel.

Conventional descriptions of interleg coupling relate to anatomical definitions such as fore- or hindlegs, right or left legs (i.e. the body is the frame of reference). This convention is obvious for forward walking, where forelegs (in anatomical terms) are also the leading legs (in terms of direction). In backward locomotion, however, the leading legs in terms of direction are the hindlegs in terms of anatomy. What effects do the anatomy and direction of movement have on the sequence of stepping? Our observations on the locomotion of mole rats in a transparent acrylic tunnel revealed that, as in nature, mole rats moved both forwards and backwards. They typically employed a diagonal sequence of steps in forward walking, whereas in backward walking they typically employed a lateral sequence. However, when stepping was described with movement direction as the frame of reference, both forward and backward walking were made up of the same sequence of steps. The same invariant trend was recorded during backward galloping, but to a lesser extent than during walking. We suggest that the backward sequence is simply a reversal of the forward sequence: a hindleg during backward locomotion acts like a foreleg in forward locomotion, while a foreleg acts like a hindleg in forward locomotion. Interleg coupling therefore remains invariant in relation to the direction of locomotion.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. Avni, Y. Tzvaigrach, and D. Eilam
Exploration and navigation in the blind mole rat (Spalax ehrenbergi): global calibration as a primer of spatial representation
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2008; 211(17): 2817 - 2826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. M. Earhart, G. Melvill Jones, F. B. Horak, E. W. Block, K. D. Weber, and W. A. Fletcher
Forward Versus Backward Walking: Transfer of Podokinetic Adaptation
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2001; 86(4): 1666 - 1670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. A. Ashley-Ross and G. V. Lauder
Motor Patterns and Kinematics During Backward Walking in the Pacific Giant Salamander: Evidence for Novel Motor Output
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1997; 78(6): 3047 - 3060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1992