QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by BODZNICK, D. Articles by BRADLEY, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by BODZNICK, D. Articles by BRADLEY, D. J.

Journal of Experimental Biology 171,107-125 (1992)
Published by Company of Biologists 1992

Suppression of Common Mode Signals Within the Electrosensory System of the Little Skate Raja Erinacea

DAVID BODZNICK ¹, JOHN C. MONTGOMERY ¹, and DAVID J. BRADLEY ¹

¹ Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA

The electroreceptors of elasmobranchs are strongly modulated by the fish's own ventilation but this source of potential interference is suppressed within the medulla. The mechanism for the suppression is thought to be based on the common mode nature of the ventilatory noise, i.e. it is of the same amplitude and phase for all of the electroreceptors, compared with environmental electric fields which affect the receptors differentially. Evidence for the common mode suppression hypothesis is provided here in skates by the observation that the response to an artificial common mode stimulus that is independent of ventilation and delivered through an electrode inserted into the animal's gut is also suppressed by the medullary neurons; the extent to which a particular neuron suppresses the responses to the gut stimulus and to ventilation is similar. In addition, a potential modulation of 5–150µV is measured between the skate's interior and the sea water during ventilation and this appears to be responsible for the self-stimulation. By passing d.c. or sinusoidal currents through the gut electrode it is demonstrated that this ventilatory potential is due to the variable shunting of a standing d.c. potential across the fish's skin by the opening and closing of the mouth and gill slits during ventilation. Osmoregulatory ion-pumping appears to contribute to the production of the d.c. potential.

Note:

Present address: Department of Biology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06457, USA.

Present address: Department of Zoology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Key words: elasmobranch, electroreception, noise suppression, reafference, medulla, Raja erinacea

Accepted on June 23, 1992

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. A. Caputi, P. A. Aguilera, and M. E. Castello Probability and amplitude of novelty responses as a function of the change in contrast of the reafferent image in G. carapo J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2003; 206(6): 999 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Montgomery and D Bodznick Signals and noise in the elasmobranch electrosensory system J. Exp. Biol., January 5, 1999; 202(10): 1349 - 1355. [Abstract] [PDF]