QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by DEBAN, S. M. Articles by NISHIKAWA, K. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by DEBAN, S. M. Articles by NISHIKAWA, K. C.

Journal of Experimental Biology 170,235-256 (1992)
Published by Company of Biologists 1992

The Kinematics of Prey Capture and the Mechanism of Tongue Protraction in the Green Tree Frog Hyla Cinerea

STEPHEN M. DEBAN ¹ and KIISA C. NISHIKAWA ²

¹ Physiology and Functional Morphology Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA; Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
² Physiology and Functional Morphology Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA

Prey capture was studied in the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea) before and after denervation of either the m. genioglossus or m. submentalis using high-speed videography and kinematic analysis. The prey capture behavior and extent of tongue protraction of several members of the subfamilies Hylinae, Pelodryadinae and Phyllomedusinae were also studied. Results show that the m. genioglossus is necessary to produce complete tongue protraction and that the m. submentalis is necessary for mandibular bending, but not necessary for complete tongue protraction in Hyla cinerea. The tongue of Hyla cinerea resembles the weakly protrusible tongues of the archaeobatrachian frogs Ascaphus and Discoglossus more than the highly protrusible tongues of other neobatrachians, such as Rana or Bufo. A weakly protrusible tongue is present in the subfamilies Hylinae and Pelodryadinae, and a highly protrusible tongue is present in the subfamily Phyllomedusinae. These results suggest that hyline and pelodryadine hylids have retained the ancestral anuran tongue morphology and that highly protrusible tongues have evolved once within the family Hylidae, in the subfamily Phyllomedusinae.

Key words: feeding, denervation, frogs, kinematics, prey capture, Hyla cinerea

Accepted on June 5, 1992

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. J. Clark and A. P. Summers Morphology and kinematics of feeding in hagfish: possible functional advantages of jaws J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2007; 210(22): 3897 - 3909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Higham The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: Morphology, behavior, and performance Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 82 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Meyers, J. C. O'Reilly, J. A. Monroy, and K. C. Nishikawa Mechanism of tongue protraction in microhylid frogs J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2004; 207(1): 21 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Deban, J. C. O'Reilly, and K. C. Nishikawa The Evolution of the Motor Control of Feeding in Amphibians Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2001; 41(6): 1280 - 1298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Mallett, G. T. Yamaguchi, J. M. Birch, and K. C. Nishikawa Feeding Motor Patterns in Anurans: Insights from Biomechanical Modeling Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2001; 41(6): 1364 - 1374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Deban and U Dicke Motor control of tongue movement during prey capture in plethodontid salamanders J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(24): 3699 - 3714. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Nishikawa, W. Kier, and K. Smith Morphology and mechanics of tongue movement in the African pig-nosed frog Hemisus marmoratum: a muscular hydrostatic model J. Exp. Biol., January 4, 1999; 202(7): 771 - 780. [Abstract] [PDF]