spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KATOH, K.
Right arrow Articles by NAITOH, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by KATOH, K.
Right arrow Articles by NAITOH, Y.
Journal of Experimental Biology 168,253-267 (1992)
Published by Company of Biologists 1992


A Mechanosensory Mechanism for Evoking Cellular Contraction in Vorticella

KAORU KATOH 1 and YUTAKA NAITOH 1

1 Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Tsukuba Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan

1. Vorticella contracted (i.e. shrinkage of the cell body and coiling of the stalk) in response to being touched with a microneedle.

2. The threshold excursion of the microneedle required to evoke a contraction was smallest on the cell body. On the stalk, it was larger in regions farther from the cell body.

3. Hitting the stalk did not evoke a contraction if the stalk was mechanically clamped in a region between the site of the hit and the cell body.

4. Rapidly drawing a small portion of the cell body into a micropipette by suction evoked a contraction, whereas a similar stimulus applied to the stalk did not.

5. The threshold depression of the surface membrane of the cell body required to evoke a contraction was inversely proportional to the rate of depression.

6. Tilting the stalk of a specimen detached from its substratum evoked a contraction. The threshold degree of tilting was inversely proportional to the angular velocity of tilting.

7. Tilting the stalk is assumed to cause a localized depression of the surface membrane of the cell body around the stalk.

8. We concluded (1) that the cell body is mechanosensitive and is the site where contractions are initiated; (2) that hitting the stalk evokes a contraction because the hit exerts a mechanical effect on the cell body; and (3) that the rate of expansion of the membrane of the cell body is responsible for activation of a hypothetical mechanoreceptor mechanism which initiates a contraction.

Note:
Present address and address for reprint requests: JSPS Liaison Office, Bonn, ‘Bonn-Center’, HI-1104, Bundeskanzlerplatz 2-10, 5300 Bonn 1, Germany.

Key words: mechanoreception, cellular contraction, Vorticella

Accepted on March 11, 1992




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
A. Upadhyaya, M. Baraban, J. Wong, P. Matsudaira, A. van Oudenaarden, and L. Mahadevan
Power-Limited Contraction Dynamics of Vorticella convallaria: An Ultrafast Biological Spring
Biophys. J., January 1, 2008; 94(1): 265 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1992