spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TANG, J.
Right arrow Articles by WARDLE, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by TANG, J.
Right arrow Articles by WARDLE, C. S.
Journal of Experimental Biology 166,33-46 (1992)
Published by Company of Biologists 1992


Power Output of Two Sizes of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar) at their Maximum Sustained Swimming Speeds

J. TANG 1 and C. S. WARDLE 1

1 SOAFD Marine Laboratory Victoria Road, PO Box 101, Aberdeen, UK

The maximum sustained swimming speeds (Ums) for large (0.45 m long) and small (0.15 m) Atlantic salmon were respectively 0.91ms-1 and 0.54ms-1. Video and cin6 films of fish swimming close to Ums were analysed to obtain variables required for the application of two hydrodynamic models, those of Lighthill and Yates, to determine the mean thrust (T) and mean power output (P) at these swimming speeds (U) close to Ums. A large fish (‘Salmon’) and a small fish (‘Smolt’) were selected for analysis. For salmon using Lighthill's model, T=0.30N and P=0.26W, and using Yates' model, T=0.28N and P=0.25W (U/=0.87ms-1=0.96Ums). For smolt using Lighthill's model, T=0.0052N and P=0.0019W, and using Yates' model, T=0.0065 N and P=0.0024W (U=0.37ms-1=0.69Ums). The power output for smolt swimming at 0.69Ums was corrected to that required to swim at Ums, giving P=0.0059W (Lighthill's model) and P=0.0074W (Yates' model).

At Ums it was assumed that all the red muscle was used. Two fish were selected from each size group and cross-sectioned to estimate their red muscle masses. Using a maximum mass-specific power output of 5–8 W kg- for slow red muscle fibres allowed us to calculate that the large and small fish have a power output capacity of 0.125–0.3 W and 0.007–0.019 W, respectively.

The power output values at Ums derived from the different approaches for the large (0.25–0.26 W) and small (0.0059–0.0074 W) salmon agree closely. Effects of scaling are discussed.

Key words: Salmo salar, fish, muscle, swimming, power output

Accepted on January 13, 1992




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. Shadwick, S. Katz, K. Korsmeyer, T Knower, and J. Covell
Muscle dynamics in skipjack tuna: timing of red muscle shortening in relation to activation and body curvature during steady swimming
J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 1999; 202(16): 2139 - 2150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
L. Rome, D Swank, and D Corda
How fish power swimming
Science, July 16, 1993; 261(5119): 340 - 343.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1992