spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ESCH, H.
Right arrow Articles by GOLLER, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ESCH, H.
Right arrow Articles by GOLLER, F.
Journal of Experimental Biology 159,419-431 (1991)
Published by Company of Biologists 1991


Neural Control of Fibrillar Muscles in Bees During Shivering and Flight

HARALD ESCH 1 and FRANZ GOLLER 1

1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA

The big indirect flight muscles in the thorax of honeybees and bumblebees show two modes of action: they contract with ‘conventional’ twitches in response to slowly repeated muscle potentials and go into tetanus at higher muscle potential frequencies. They can also contract much faster when quickly stretched (stretch activation).

We observed contractions of DV (dorsoventral) and DL (dorsal longitudinal) muscles optically with the help of a tiny mirror glued to the scutellum. We noticed that DL muscles contracted much more than DV muscles during pre-flight warmup. During warm-up, muscle potential frequencies in DL muscles were higher than in DV muscles (DL frequency/DV frequency =1.3), whereas during flight the ratio reversed (DL/DV=0.8). The scutal fissure was completely closed during shivering warm-up, apparently because the DL muscles shortened as much as they could. As a consequence, fast antagonistic stretching was not possible. However, the scutal fissure oscillated between wide open and closed during flight, and antagonists could stretch each other quickly. Flight was started by highly synchronized ‘conventional’ contractions of many muscle elements in DV muscles. Antagonistic stretch-activation during flight led to faster shortening than during shivering warm-up and synchronized all activated muscle elements to produce maximal contractions.

The indirect flight muscles of bumblebees were in tetanic contractions during shivering warm-up over the whole range of temperatures between 8 and 36°C. These tetanic contractions probably prevented other researchers from observing mechanical muscle activity. Our results, which for the first time allow us to detect tetanic contractions directly, make it very improbable that non-shivering thermogenesis occurs in bumblebees, as has been proposed previously.

Key words: flight muscle, neural control, bees, shivering, flight, Apis mellifera ligustica, Bombus impatiens

Accepted on May 28, 1991




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. C. Nieh and D. Sanchez
Effect of food quality, distance and height on thoracic temperature in the stingless bee Melipona panamica
J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2005; 208(20): 3933 - 3943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. F. Staples, E. L. Koen, and T. M. Laverty
`Futile cycle' enzymes in the flight muscles of North American bumblebees
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2004; 207(5): 749 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1991