QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by DUDLEY, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by DUDLEY, R.

Journal of Experimental Biology 159,335-357 (1991)
Published by Company of Biologists 1991

Biomechanics of Flight in Neotropical Butterflies: Aerodynamics and Mechanical Power Requirements

ROBERT DUDLEY ¹

¹ Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, PO Box 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama

A quasi-steady aerodynamic analysis of forward flight was performed on 15 species of neotropical butterflies for which kinematic and morphological data were available. Mean lift coefficients required for flight typically exceeded maximum values obtained on insect wings under conditions of steady flow, thereby implicating unsteady aerodynamic mechanisms even during fast forward flight of some butterflies. The downstroke produced vertical forces on average 18% in excess of those necessary to support the body weight through the wingbeat, while the upstroke contributed minimal or negative vertical force. Estimated effective angles of incidence (_T of the wings averaged 39° during the downstroke and -22° during the upstroke; spanwise variation in _T was greater than the average difference between half-strokes. Total mechanical power requirements of forward flight averaged 12.5 W kg^-1, for the case of perfect elastic storage of whig inertial energy, and 20.2 W kg^-1, assuming zero elastic energy storage. Energetic costs of the erratic trajectories during forward flight increased mechanical power requirements by an average of 43%, assuming perfect elastic storage. Fluctuations in horizontal kinetic energy of the center of mass were principally responsible for this dramatic increase. When comparing different species, total mechanical power increased linearly with forward airspeed (assuming perfect elastic energy storage of inertial energy) and scaled with mass^0.26 If no elastic energy storage was assumed, mechanical power was independent of airspeed and was proportional to mass^0.36. Estimated metabolic rates during flight averaged 22 and 36 ml O₂ g^-1 h^-1, for the cases of perfect and zero elastic storage, respectively.

Note:
Mailing address: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, APO Miami, FL 34002, USA.

Key words: butterfly, flight, aerodynamics, lift coefficient, mechanical power, biomechanics

Accepted on April 30, 1991

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Lu, G. X. Shen, and G. J. Lai Dual leading-edge vortices on flapping wings J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2006; 209(24): 5005 - 5016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Sane The aerodynamics of insect flight J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4191 - 4208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Usherwood and C. P. Ellington The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2002; 205(11): 1547 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]