spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LANGBAUER, W. R.
Right arrow Articles by OSBORN, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LANGBAUER, W. R., JR
Right arrow Articles by OSBORN, F.
Journal of Experimental Biology 157,35-46 (1991)
Published by Company of Biologists 1991


African Elephants Respond to Distant Playbacks of Low-Frequency Conspecific Calls

WILLIAM R. LANGBAUER JR 1, KATHARINE B. PAYNE 1, RUSSELL A. CHARIF 1, LISA RAPAPORT 2, and FERREL OSBORN 1

1 Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology Ithaca, NY 14850, USA
2 Washington Park Zoo Portland, OR 97221, USA

We conducted 58 playback experiments with free-ranging African elephants in Etosha National Park, Namibia, to estimate the distance over which some of their low-frequency calls are audible to other elephants. We broadcast pre-recorded elephant calls to elephants that were 1.2 and 2.0 km from the speaker while making simultaneous video and audio recordings of their behavior. In order to reduce the risk of habituation, we used a variety of call types as stimuli. Elephants responded to playbacks at both 1.2 and 2.0 km, with a full response consisting of the elephant vocalizing, lifting and spreading its ears, remaining motionless in this position (‘freezing’), moving the head from side to side (‘scanning’) and, in the case of males responding to female estrous calls, orienting to and finally walking 1 km or more towards the loudspeaker.

We analyzed our data quantitatively for three of these responses. The occurrence of each behavior increased substantially immediately after playbacks.

Owing to limitations of the loudspeaker, we were only able to broadcast calls at half the sound pressure level (i.e. -6dB) of the strongest calls we have recorded. Since sound at the frequencies of these calls is predicted to suffer from little, if any, attenuation in excess of that caused by spherical spreading, we estimate these calls to be audible to elephants at least 4 km from the source (twice the distance over which we documented responses).

These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the very low-frequency calls of elephants function in communication between individuals and groups of elephants separated by distances of several kilometers.

Key words: infrasound, elephant, Loxodonta africana, communication

Accepted on December 6, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
C. E. O'Connell-Rodwell
Keeping an "Ear" to the Ground: Seismic Communication in Elephants
Physiology, August 1, 2007; 22(4): 287 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Bull.Home page
D. S. Wethey and S. A. Woodin
Infaunal Hydraulics Generate Porewater Pressure Signals
Biol. Bull., October 1, 2005; 209(2): 139 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
C. E. O'Connell-Rodwell, L. A. Hart, and B. T. Arnason
Exploring the Potential Use of Seismic Waves as a Communication Channel by Elephants and Other Large Mammals
Integr. Comp. Biol., October 1, 2001; 41(5): 1157 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
N. M. Kime, W. R. Turner, and M. J. Ryan
The transmission of advertisement calls in Central American frogs
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2000; 11(1): 71 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1991