spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DOMENICI, P.
Right arrow Articles by BLAKE, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DOMENICI, P.
Right arrow Articles by BLAKE, R. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Experimental Biology 156,187-205 (1991)
Published by Company of Biologists 1991


The Kinematics and Performance of the Escape Response in the Angelfish (Pterophyllum Eimekei)

PAOLO DOMENICI 1 and ROBERT W. BLAKE 1

1 Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 2A9

The kinematics of turning manoeuvres and the distance–time performance in escape responses of startled angelfish (Pterophyllum eimekei) are investigated employing high-speed cinematography (400 Hz). All escape responses observed are C-type fast-starts, in which the fish assumes a C shape at the end of the initial body contraction (stage 1). Kinematic analysis of the subsequent stage (stage 2) allows the response to be classified into two types: single bend (SB), in which the tail does not recoil completely after the formation of the C, and double bend (DB), in which it does.

The two types of response have different total escape angles (measured from the subsequent positions of the centre of mass, SB 120.0°; DB 73.3°, P<0.005), different stage 2 turning angles (in the same direction as stage 1 for SB, 11.0°; in the direction opposite to stage 1 for DB, -21.9°: P<0.0005) and different maximum angular velocities in the direction opposite to the initial one (SB -8.08 rad s-1; DB -56.62 rad s-1: P<0.001). There are no significant differences in stage 1 kinematics for the two types of escape. Stage 1 turning angle is linearly correlated to stage 2 turning angle for DB only (P<0.01; r2=0.60) and to total escape angle for both types of response (P<0.0001; r2=0.80). Stage 1 duration is linearly correlated to stage 1 turning angle (P<0.0001; r2=0.83) and to total escape angle (P<0.0001; r2=0.72) for both types of escape.

Distance–time performance is also different in the two response types, mainly because of differences in stage 2 (maximum velocity for SB 0.99 ms-1; maximum velocity for DB 1.53 ms-1: maximum acceleration for SB 34.1 ms-2; maximum acceleration for DB 74.7 ms-2: P<0.0001 in both cases). As a result, there are significant differences in the performance throughout the whole response (maximum velocity 1.02 ms-1 and 1.53 ms-1 for SB and DB fast-starts, respectively; maximum acceleration 63.2 ms-2 and 91.9 ms-2 for SB and DB fast-starts, respectively) as well as within a fixed time (0.03 s). Overall, higher distance–time performances associated with smaller angles of turn are found in DB than in SB responses.

Comparison with previous studies reveals that angelfish have a good fast-start performance despite specializations for low-speed swimming. In addition, the angelfish turning radius (0.065±0.0063 L, where L is body length; mean±2 S.E.) is lower than that previously reported for any fish.

Key words: angelfish, C-start, kinematics, manoeuvrability, performance, Pterophyllum eimekei

Accepted on November 13, 1990


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
P. Domenici, H. Turesson, J. Brodersen, and C. Bronmark
Predator-induced morphology enhances escape locomotion in crucian carp
Proc R Soc B, January 22, 2008; 275(1631): 195 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. Wu, Y. Yang, and L. Zeng
Routine turning maneuvers of koi carp Cyprinus carpio koi: effects of turning rate on kinematics and hydrodynamics
J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2007; 210(24): 4379 - 4389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
P Domenici, C Lefrancois, and A Shingles
Hypoxia and the antipredator behaviours of fishes
Phil Trans R Soc B, November 29, 2007; 362(1487): 2105 - 2121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
T. E. Higham
The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: Morphology, behavior, and performance
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 82 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Domenici, E. M. Standen, and R. P. Levine
Escape manoeuvres in the spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias)
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2004; 207(13): 2339 - 2349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F. E. Fish and A. J. Nicastro
Aquatic turning performance by the whirligig beetle: constraints on maneuverability by a rigid biological system
J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2003; 206(10): 1649 - 1656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Brackenbury
Escape manoeuvres in damsel-fly larvae: kinematics and dynamics
J. Exp. Biol., March 2, 2003; 206(2): 389 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. D. Tytell and G. V. Lauder
The C-start escape response of Polypterus senegalus: bilateral muscle activity and variation during stage 1 and 2
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2002; 205(17): 2591 - 2603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. E. Hale
S- and C-start escape responses of the muskellunge (Esox masquinongy) require alternative neuromotor mechanisms
J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2002; 205(14): 2005 - 2016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Hove, L. O'Bryan, M. Gordon, P. Webb, and D Weihs
Boxfishes (Teleostei: Ostraciidae) as a model system for fishes swimming with many fins: kinematics
J. Exp. Biol., January 4, 2001; 204(8): 1459 - 1471.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E Drucker and G Lauder
Wake dynamics and fluid forces of turning maneuvers in sunfish
J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2001; 204(3): 431 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Walker
Does a rigid body limit maneuverability?
J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2000; 203(22): 3391 - 3396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P Domenici, R. Batty, T Simila, and E Ogam
Killer whales (Orcinus orca) feeding on schooling herring (Clupea harengus) using underwater tail-slaps: kinematic analyses of field observations
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2000; 203(2): 283 - 294.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Nauen and R. Shadwick
The scaling of acceleratory aquatic locomotion: body size and tail-flip performance of the california spiny lobster panulirus interruptus
J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 1999; 202(22): 3181 - 3193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Hale
Locomotor mechanics during early life history: effects of size and ontogeny on fast-start performance of salmonid fishes
J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 1999; 202(11): 1465 - 1479.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
I. Spierts and J. Leeuwen
Kinematics and muscle dynamics of C- and S-starts of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.)
J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 1999; 202(4): 393 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1991