spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PINDER, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by FEDER, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PINDER, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by FEDER, M. E.
Journal of Experimental Biology 154,67-80 (1990)
Published by Company of Biologists 1990


Effect of Boundary Layers on Cutaneous Gas Exchange

ALAN W. PINDER 1 and MARTIN E. FEDER 2

1 Anatomy Department, University of Chicago, 1025 E. 57 Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1, Canada
2 Anatomy Department, University of Chicago, 1025 E. 57 Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

Boundary layers may offer significant resistance to cutaneous oxygen uptake by amphibians in water. This hypothesis was tested by measuring resistance to oxygen uptake as a function of water velocity in bullfrogs submerged at 5 °C and by direct measurements of the boundary layer with oxygen microelectrodes. The oxygen diffusion boundary layer was easily measurable with oxygen microelectrodes. The proportion of the total resistance to oxygen uptake represented by the boundary layer increased from 35 % at a water velocity of 5 cms-1 1 to over 90% at 0.1 cms-1. At water velocities below lcms-1 oxygen uptake was limited by the resistance of the boundary layer. At 0.1 cms-1, the partial pressure of oxygen immediately adjacent to the skin was only 2 kPa (15 mmHg); placing an immobilized frog in still water was tantamount to placing it in anoxic water. Body movements disrupted boundary layers efficiently; even occasional small movements by the animal (1 min-1) were sufficient to maintainoxygen uptake in still water.

Key words: boundary layer, oxygen uptake, amphibian, Rana catesbeiana

Accepted on June 18, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
T. Schwerte, D. Uberbacher, and B. Pelster
Non-invasive imaging of blood cell concentration and blood distribution in zebrafish Danio rerio incubated in hypoxic conditions in vivo
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2003; 206(8): 1299 - 1307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1990