QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by SANFORD, C. P. J. Articles by LAUDER, G. V. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by SANFORD, C. P. J. Articles by LAUDER, G. V.

Journal of Experimental Biology 154,137-162 (1990)
Published by Company of Biologists 1990

Kinematics of the Tongue-Bite Apparatus in Osteoglossomorph Fishes

CHRISTOPHER P. J. SANFORD ¹ and GEORGE V. LAUDER ²

¹ Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, CA 92717, USA; Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
² Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, CA 92717, USA

Osteoglossomorph fishes are characterized by the possession of three sets of jaws used during the capture, maceration and swallowing of prey. One of these jaw systems is a remarkable tongue-bite apparatus used during the intraoral crushing and shredding of prey. Kinematics of the tongue-bite apparatus were quantified, using 200 framess^-1 video and film records of feeding in three genera of osteoglossomorph fishes (Osteoglossum, Pantodon and Notopterus) to examine the biomechanics and function of this mechanical system. Two distinct chewing behaviors associated with the tongue-bite apparatus were identified: raking and open-mouth chewing. In all three species, raking behavior involves holding the prey firmly in the mandibular jaws while the teeth of the tongue-bite apparatus are moved into the prey. However, other aspects of raking behavior are significantly different among the species: for example, only Notopterus uses extensive posterior movement of the pectoral girdle to pull basihyal teeth through the prey. In both Osteoglossum and Pantodon there is little motion of the pectoral girdle, and neurocranial elevation plays the major mechanical role in prey reduction, but there are also kinematic differences between Osteoglossum and Pantodon during raking. The kinematics of open-mouth chewing behavior are also significantly different among the three species. Thus, osteoglossomorph fishes share a similar morphology of the tongue-bite apparatus derived from a common ancestor, but have acquired independent kinematic specializations associated with its use.

Key words: Kinematics, feeding, fishes, high-speed video

Accepted on June 6, 1990

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Konow, A. L. Camp, and C. P. J. Sanford Congruence between muscle activity and kinematics in a convergently derived prey-processing behavior Integr. Comp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 48(2): 246 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Konow and C. P. J. Sanford Is a convergently derived muscle-activity pattern driving novel raking behaviours in teleost fishes? J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2008; 211(6): 989 - 999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Clark and A. P. Summers Morphology and kinematics of feeding in hagfish: possible functional advantages of jaws J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2007; 210(22): 3897 - 3909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. P. J. Sanford Kinematic analysis of a novel feeding mechanism in the brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis (Teleostei: Salmonidae): behavioral modulation of a functional novelty J. Exp. Biol., March 13, 2002; 204(22): 3905 - 3916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]