spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DIXON, A. F. G.
Right arrow Articles by GOWING, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DIXON, A. F. G.
Right arrow Articles by GOWING, R. P.
Journal of Experimental Biology 152,243-253 (1990)
Published by Company of Biologists 1990


The Mechanism by Which Aphids Adhere to Smooth Surfaces

A. F. G. DIXON 1, P. C. CROGHAN 1, and R. P. GOWING 1

1 School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ

1. The adhesive force acting between the adhesive organs and substratum for a number of aphid species has been studied. In the case of Aphis fabae, the force per foot is about 10 µN. This is much the same on both glass (amphiphilic) and silanized glass (hydrophobic) surfaces. The adhesive force is about 20 times greater than the gravitational force tending to detach each foot of an inverted aphid.

2. The mechanism of adhesion was considered. Direct van der Waals forces and viscous force were shown to be trivial and electrostatic force and muscular force were shown to be improbable. An adhesive force resulting from surface tension at an air-fluid interface was shown to be adequate and likely.

3. Evidence was collected that the working fluid of the adhesive organ has the properties of a dilute aqueous solution of a surfactant. There is a considerable reserve of fluid, presumably in the cuticle of the adhesive organ.

Key words: adhesive organ, aphid, surface tension

Accepted on April 30, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. Gorb, K. Haas, A. Henrich, S. Enders, N. Barbakadze, and S. Gorb
Composite structure of the crystalline epicuticular wax layer of the slippery zone in the pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes alata and its effect on insect attachment
J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2005; 208(24): 4651 - 4662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. N. Gorb and E. V. Gorb
Ontogenesis of the attachment ability in the bug Coreus marginatus (Heteroptera, Insecta)
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2004; 207(17): 2917 - 2924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
W. Federle, W. Baumgartner, and B. Holldobler
Biomechanics of ant adhesive pads: frictional forces are rate- and temperature-dependent
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2004; 207(1): 67 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
K. Autumn and A. M. Peattie
Mechanisms of Adhesion in Geckos
Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2002; 42(6): 1081 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
O. Betz
Performance and adaptive value of tarsal morphology in rove beetles of the genus Stenus (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae)
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2002; 205(8): 1097 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S Gorb, E Gorb, and V Kastner
Scale effects on the attachment pads and friction forces in syrphid flies (Diptera, Syrphidae)
J. Exp. Biol., January 4, 2001; 204(8): 1421 - 1431.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
Y Jiao, S Gorb, and M Scherge
Adhesion measured on the attachment pads of Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera, insecta)
J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 2000; 203(12): 1887 - 1895.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
W Federle, K Rohrseitz, and B Holldobler
Attachment forces of ants measured with a centrifuge: better 'wax-runners' have a poorer attachment to a smooth surface
J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2000; 203(3): 505 - 512.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1990