spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DICKINSON, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DICKINSON, M. H.
Journal of Experimental Biology 151,245-261 (1990)
Published by Company of Biologists 1990


Comparison of Encoding Properties of Campaniform Sensilla on the Fly Wing

MICHAEL H. DICKINSON 1

1 Department of Zoology NJ-15, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Roche Institute of Molecular Biology, 340 Kingsland Street, Nutley, NJ 07110, USA

The wing blade of the blowfly Calliphora vomitoria (L.) carries an array of campaniform sensilla which have previously been divided into slowly and rapidly adapting classes based on their responses to step indentations. In the present study, the physiological characteristics of six sensilla of these two classes are examined within a 20-400 Hz frequency range, using a noise analysis that quantifies linear and nonlinear encoding properties. Both classes exhibit a broad response maximum near 150 Hz, corresponding to the typical wingbeat frequency of the blowfly, and display rectification, limiting the spike response to a narrow portion of a stimulus cycle. The similarity in the encoding properties between the two groups is largely a consequence of the high wingbeat frequency of flies, which precludes any individual neurone from acting as a magnitude detector. Instead, during flight the campaniform neurones might act as ‘one-shot’ detectors, firing a single action potential at a precise phase of each wing stroke cycle. An array of such detectors would be capable of monitoring the passage of a deformational wave as it travels along the wing during each wingbeat.

Key words: campaniform sensilla, fly wing, encoding properties

Accepted on February 16, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. Sherman and M. H. Dickinson
Summation of visual and mechanosensory feedback in Drosophila flight control
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2004; 207(1): 133 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. A. Frye
Encoding properties of the wing hinge stretch receptor in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta
J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 2001; 204(21): 3693 - 3702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Fayyazuddin and M. H. Dickinson
Haltere Afferents Provide Direct, Electrotonic Input to a Steering Motor Neuron in the Blowfly, Calliphora
J. Neurosci., August 15, 1996; 16(16): 5225 - 5232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1990