|
| |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | ||||
Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 150, Issue 1 233-246, Copyright © 1990 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
RJ Full, DA Zuccarello and A Tullis
Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley 94720.
The mass-specific minimum cost of terrestrial locomotion (Cmin) decreases with an increase in body mass. This generalization spans nearly eight orders of magnitude in body mass and includes two phyla. The general relationship between metabolic cost and mass is striking. However, a significant amount of unexplained interspecific variation in Cmin exists at any given body mass. To determine how variation in morphology and physiology affects metabolic energy cost, we measured the oxygen consumption of three comparably sized insects running on a miniature treadmill; the American cockroach Periplaneta americana, the caterpillar hunting beetle Calosoma affine and the Australian field cricket Teleogryllus commodus. Steady-state oxygen consumption (VO2ss) increased linearly with speed. Cmin was similar for crickets and cockroaches (8.0 and 8.5 ml O2 g-1km-1, respectively), but was substantially lower for beetles (4.6 ml O2 g-1km-1). The predicted value of Cmin for all three insects was within the 95% confidence intervals of the Cmin versus body mass function. However, the 95% confidence intervals extend approximately 2.5-fold above and 40% below the regression line, making the variation at any given body mass nearly sixfold. Normalizing for the rate of muscle force production by determining the metabolic cost per stride failed to account for the interspecific variation in the cost of locomotion observed in the three insects. Ground contact costs (i.e. VO2ss multiplied by leg contact time during a stride) in insects were similar to those measured in mammals (1.5-3.1 J kg-1) and were independent of speed, but did not explain the interspecific variation in the cost of locomotion. Muscles of the caterpillar hunting beetle may have a greater mechanical advantage than muscles of the Australian field cricket and American cockroach. Variation in musculo-skeletal arrangement, apart from variation in body mass, could translate into significant differences in the minimum cost of terrestrial locomotion.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Rubenson, D. B. Heliams, S. K. Maloney, P. C. Withers, D. G. Lloyd, and P. A. Fournier Reappraisal of the comparative cost of human locomotion using gait-specific allometric analyses J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2007; 210(20): 3513 - 3524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. Fleming and P. W. Bateman Just drop it and run: the effect of limb autotomy on running distance and locomotion energetics of field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus) J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1446 - 1454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. R. White, P. G. D. Matthews, and R. S. Seymour Balancing the competing requirements of saltatorial and fossorial specialisation: burrowing costs in the spinifex hopping mouse, Notomys alexis J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2006; 209(11): 2103 - 2113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F.-O. Lehmann and N. Heymann Unconventional mechanisms control cyclic respiratory gas release in flying Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., October 1, 2005; 208(19): 3645 - 3654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Schmitz Spiders on a treadmill: influence of running activity on metabolic rates in Pardosa lugubris (Araneae, Lycosidae) and Marpissa muscosa (Araneae, Salticidae) J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2005; 208(7): 1401 - 1411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Lipp, H. Wolf, and F.-O. Lehmann Walking on inclines: energetics of locomotion in the ant Camponotus J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2005; 208(4): 707 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Girard, M. W. McAleer, J. S. Rhodes, and T. Garland Jr. Selection for high voluntary wheel-running increases speed and intermittency in house mice (Mus domesticus) J. Exp. Biol., March 14, 2002; 204(24): 4311 - 4320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. T. Gleeson and T. V. Hancock Modeling the Metabolic Energetics of Brief and Intermittent Locomotion in Lizards and Rodents Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2001; 41(2): 211 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Rogowitz and M. Chappell Energy metabolism of eucalyptus-boring beetles at rest and during locomotion: gender makes a difference J. Exp. Biol., January 4, 2000; 203(7): 1131 - 1139. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Baker and T. Gleeson The effects of intensity on the energetics of brief locomotor activity J. Exp. Biol., January 11, 1999; 202(22): 3081 - 3087. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. M. CASEY Energetics of Caterpillar Locomotion: Biomechanical Constraints of a Hydraulic Skeleton Science, April 5, 1991; 252(5002): 112 - 114. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Biewener Biomechanics of mammalian terrestrial locomotion Science, November 23, 1990; 250(4984): 1097 - 1103. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
