spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TUCKER, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by HEINE, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by TUCKER, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by HEINE, C.
Journal of Experimental Biology 149,469-489 (1990)
Published by Company of Biologists 1990


AERODYNAMICS OF GLIDING FLIGHT IN A HARRIS' HAWK, PARABUTEO UNICINCTUS

VANCE A. TUCKER 1 and CARLTON HEINE 1

1 Department of Zoology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27706, USA

1. A Harris' hawk with a mass of 0.702 kg and a maximum wing span of 1.02 m glided freely in a wind tunnel at air speeds between 6.1 and 16.2ms-1. The glide angle varied from 8.5% at the slowest speed to a minimum of 5% at speeds between 8.0 and 14.7 ms-1. The maximum ratio of lift to drag was 10.9 and the minimum sinking speed was 0.81ms-1

2. Wing span decreased when either air speed or glide angle increased. Wing area was a parabolic function of wing span

3. Lift and profile drag coefficients of the wings fell in a polar area similar to that for a laggar falcon (Falco jugger) and a black vulture (Coragyps atratus). A single polar curve relating lift coefficients to minimum profile drag coefficients can predict the maximum gliding performance of all three birds when used with a mathematical model for gliding flight

4. The parasite drag values that have been used with the model are probably too high. Thus, the profile drag coefficients determined from the polar curve mentioned above are too low, and the predicted wing spans for gliding at maximum performance are too large. The predicted curve for maximum gliding performance is relatively unaffected

5. The maximum lift coefficient for the Harris' hawk in the wind tunnel was 1.6. This value is probably less than the maximum attainable, since the hawk's wings never appeared to stall. The best estimate of the minimum profile drag coefficient is 0.026 at a lift coefficient of 0.60.

Key words: bird flight, glide angle, gliding performance, lift coefficient, polar curve, profile drag, sinking speed, wind tunnel

Accepted on October 31, 1989




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. Henningsson, G. R. Spedding, and A. Hedenstrom
Vortex wake and flight kinematics of a swift in cruising flight in a wind tunnel
J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2008; 211(5): 717 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. G. McCAY
AERODYNAMIC STABILITY AND MANEUVERABILITY OF THE GLIDING FROG POLYPEDATES DENNYSI
J. Exp. Biol., March 10, 2002; 204(16): 2817 - 2826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M Rosen and A Hedenstrom
Gliding flight in a jackdaw: a wind tunnel study
J. Exp. Biol., January 3, 2001; 204(6): 1153 - 1166.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1990