spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by IBBOTSON, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by GOODMAN, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by IBBOTSON, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by GOODMAN, L. J.
Journal of Experimental Biology 148,255-279 (1990)
Published by Company of Biologists 1990


Response Characteristics of Four Wide-Field Motion-Sensitive Descending Interneurones IN Apis Melufera

MICHAEL R. IBBOTSON 1 and LESLEY J. GOODMAN 1

1 School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary College, University of London Mile End Road, London El 4NS, UK

The anatomical projections and directional tuning of four descending interneurones sensitive to wide-field motion over the compound eyes are described. The cells are slow to adapt, resistant to habituation and their responses are dependent on the contrast frequency of the periodic patterns used as stimuli. Two of the cells (DNIV2 and DNIV4) are maximally stimulated by movement around the longitudinal axis of the bee (simulated roll), one (DNII2) by movement around the horizontal axis (simulated pitch) and one (DNVI1) by movement around the vertical axis (simulated yaw). The cells are binocular, their directional response being shaped by the interaction of the inputs from each eye. The cells which respond predominantly to roll (DNIV2 and DNIV4) have their arborizations restricted to the ipsilateral side of the brain and thoracic ganglia, i.e. the side which contains the cell soma. The cell responding to pitch (DNII2) has its arborizations distributed bilaterally, invading similar regions of the neuropile in both sides of the brain and thoracic ganglia. The cell which responds to yaw (DNVI1) has its major dendritic field in the ipsilateral side of the brain and descends into the thoracic ganglia in the contralateral side. The majority of its arborizations in the thoracic ganglia are confined to the contralateral neuropile.

Key words: insect vision, motion-sensitive interneurones, directional tuning, contrast frequency, honeybee brain

Accepted on August 21, 1989




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Wertz, A. Borst, and J. Haag
Nonlinear Integration of Binocular Optic Flow by DNOVS2, A Descending Neuron of the Fly
J. Neurosci., March 19, 2008; 28(12): 3131 - 3140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Karmeier, H. G. Krapp, and M. Egelhaaf
Robustness of the Tuning of Fly Visual Interneurons to Rotatory Optic Flow
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1626 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1990