QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stephenson, R. Articles by Blake, R. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Stephenson, R. Articles by Blake, R. W.

Journal of Experimental Biology 147,507-518 (1989)
Published by Company of Biologists 1989

A Hydromechanical Estimate of the Power Requirements of Diving and Surface Swimming in Lesser Scaup (Aythya Affinis)

R. Stephenson ¹, J. R. Loworn ¹, M. A. Heieis ¹, D. R. Jones ¹, and R. W. Blake ¹

¹ University of British Columbia, Zoology Department, 6270 University Boulevard Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 2A9

Buoyancy and body drag were measured in lesser scaup (Aythya affinis) and the data were used to estimate average power output during diving and surface swimming. Buoyant force (mean±s.D.) of fully submerged ducks was 2.89±0.17 N (body mass 0.623±0.089kg; body volume 918±88cm³; N=11). Buoyancy was decreased by 6.2° by artificial compression of the feathers during full immersion, but was reduced by 42° when the ducks were allowed to breathe during head-out immersion. Therefore, voluntary compression of the plumage by the duck appears to have relatively small effects on buoyancy and hence dive costs, whereas alteration of respiratory volume (e.g. by pre-dive expiration) could substantiallyalter buoyancy and power requirements.

Surface and subsurface body drag (D_SUR and D_SUB respectively, in newtons) of frozen duck carcasses increased with velocity (U, ms^-1) as follows:

D_SUR= 0.239-1.292U+2.027U² (r² = 0.965),

D_SUB = - 0.144+0.562U + 0.622U² (r² = 0.980) .

Work required to overcome body drag is greater for a lesser scaup during diving than during surface swimming at average velocities normally attained during these activities (less than 0.7 ms^-1). However, the drag force curves merge at 0.8-l.0ms^-1.

It is calculated that the average power output during diving ranges from 1.003 to 1.695 W and that in ducks at least 95° of the work done during a dive is required to overcome buoyancy. Comparison of these biomechanical estimates with aerobic metabolic power input (V_oo2) data reported by Woakes and Butler (1983) indicates that, for freely diving ducks, aerobic efficiency (a=average power output/total aerobic power input) is 0.088–0.149 and net aerobic efficiency [_net=average power output/(total aerobic power input minus resting aerobic power input)] is 0.124–0.209. These values are significantly greater than those during surface swimming at the same velocities (a=0.004–0.037, _net=0.039–0.063).

Key words: ducks, energetics, hydromechanics, locomotion

Accepted on August 2, 1989

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. W. Blake and K. H. S. Chan Swimming in the upside down catfish Synodontis nigriventris: it matters which way is up J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2007; 210(17): 2979 - 2989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Watanabe, E. A. Baranov, K. Sato, Y. Naito, and N. Miyazaki Body density affects stroke patterns in Baikal seals J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2006; 209(17): 3269 - 3280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Ribak, D. Weihs, and Z. Arad How do cormorants counter buoyancy during submerged swimming? J. Exp. Biol., May 15, 2004; 207(12): 2101 - 2114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Wilson and F. Quintana Surface pauses in relation to dive duration in imperial cormorants; how much time for a breather? J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2004; 207(11): 1789 - 1796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Sato, Y. Mitani, M. F. Cameron, D. B. Siniff, and Y. Naito Factors affecting stroking patterns and body angle in diving Weddell seals under natural conditions J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2003; 206(9): 1461 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Zeffer and U. M. L. Norberg Leg morphology and locomotion in birds: requirements for force and speed during ankle flexion J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2003; 206(6): 1085 - 1097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Sato, Y. Naito, A. Kato, Y. Niizuma, Y. Watanuki, J. B. Charrassin, C.-A. Bost, Y. Handrich, and Y. Le Maho Buoyancy and maximal diving depth in penguins: do they control inhaling air volume? J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2002; 205(9): 1189 - 1197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Ancel, L. Starke, P. Ponganis, R Van Dam, and G. Kooyman Energetics of surface swimming in Brandt's cormorants (Phalacrocorax penicillatus brandt) J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 2000; 203(24): 3727 - 3731. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Hawkins, P. Butler, A. Woakes, and J. Speakman Estimation of the rate of oxygen consumption of the common eider duck (Somateria mollissima), with some measurements of heart rate during voluntary dives J. Exp. Biol., January 9, 2000; 203(18): 2819 - 2832. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Lovvorn, D. Croll, and G. Liggins Mechanical versus physiological determinants of swimming speeds in diving Brunnich's guillemots J. Exp. Biol., January 7, 1999; 202(13): 1741 - 1752. [Abstract] [PDF]