QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by WECKSTRÖM, M. Articles by JÄRVILEHTO, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by WECKSTRÖM, M. Articles by JÄRVILEHTO, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Journal of Experimental Biology 144,147-154 (1989)
Published by Company of Biologists 1989

More than One Type of Conductance is Activated During Responses of Blowfly Monopolar Neurones

M. WECKSTRÖM ¹, E. KOUVALAINEN ², K. DJUPSUND ², and M. JÄRVILEHTO ³

¹ Department of Physiology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing St, Cambridge, UK
² Department of Physiology, University of Oulu Oulu, Finland
³ Department of Zoology, University of Oulu Oulu, Finland

The principal second-order neurones in the blowfly compound eye, the large monopolar neurones (LMCs), were studied using intracellular recording and discontinuous current-clamp techniques, in combination with measurement of dynamic input resistance. The LMCs had resting potentials of -35 to -45 mV and showed a linear current-voltage relationship in the lamina in the physiological voltage range. The hyperpolarizing light-on transient was associated with a drop in input resistance from 17 ± 5 to 3 ± 1M, and had a reversal potential between -60 and -90 mV. The dynamic input resistance of saturated responses and the properties of reversed responses suggested that more than one conductance was activated during the response of the LMCs. In lamina recordings, the input resistance increased beyond the resting level during repolarization, which can be interpreted in terms of a continuous release of transmitter by the photoreceptor terminals, even in darkness. The input resistance of LMCs in axon recordings in darkness and during the light-on response was generally higher than in the lamina recordings. The responses to light in axons also differed from those recorded in lamina by showing regenerative properties.

Key words: compound eye, postsynaptic responses, chloride channels, current injection

Accepted on March 1, 1989

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. O. Uusitalo and M. Weckstrom Potentiation in the First Visual Synapse of the Fly Compound Eye J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2000; 83(4): 2103 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Benkenstein, M Schmidt, and M Gewecke Voltage-activated whole-cell K+ currents in lamina cells of the desert locust schistocerca gregaria J. Exp. Biol., January 7, 1999; 202(14): 1939 - 1951. [Abstract] [PDF]