QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) A correction has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by RÜPPELL, G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by RÜPPELL, G.

Journal of Experimental Biology 144,13-42 (1989)
Published by Company of Biologists 1989

Kinematic Analysis of Symmetrical Flight Manoeuvres of Odonata

G. RÜPPELL ¹

¹ Zoological Institute, Technical University of Braunschweig, Pockelstraße 10a, D-3300 Braunschweig, FRG

By analysis of slow-motion films of dragonflies and damselflies in free flight, released in front of a backdrop or startled during flight, the following flight parameters have been quantified for symmetrical manoeuvres: wingbeat frequency, relative durations of up- and downstroke, phase relationships of the beats of fore- and hindwings, stroke amplitude, mean stroke velocity, flight velocity, nondimensional flight velocity, advance ratio, acceleration, angle of attack and stroke plane.

The wingbeat frequencies are higher in the smaller species and in those with relatively large wing loading. As a rule, Zygoptera have a wingbeat frequency only half that of Anisoptera. The stroke amplitude is almost always much larger in Zygoptera than in Anisoptera, which have a greater range of variation in this respect. Stroke velocity is higher in Anisoptera than in Zygoptera; it is also higher in the more elaborate flight manoeuvres than in others. The calculated stroke velocities resemble those actually measured.

Anisoptera fly more rapidly than Zygoptera. With respect to the nondimensional flight velocities, it is notable that although the values for Anisoptera are higher than those for Zygoptera, they are exceeded by the Calopterygidae; the latter can fold their wings back during rapid forward flight and shoot away, as in the ‘ballistic’ flight of small songbirds. However, the advance ratio is higher in Anisoptera than in Calopterygidae.

Anisoptera also perform better than Zygoptera with respect to acceleration. Three categories of phase relationships between the beats of the fore- and hindwings are established: counterstroking, phase-shifted stroking and parallel stroking. Counterstroking produces uniform flight, whereas the flight produced by phase-shifted and, in particular, parallel stroking is irregular. The angles of attack of the wings are shown to be associated with particular flight manoeuvres, as are the stroke planes. Flight manoeuvres are discussed without drawing detailed aerodynamic conclusions. The flight of Anisoptera is compared with that of Zygoptera.

Key words: Odonata, kinematics, free flight

Accepted on March 24, 1989

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F.-O. Lehmann When wings touch wakes: understanding locomotor force control by wake wing interference in insect wings J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 224 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Maybury and F.-O. Lehmann The fluid dynamics of flight control by kinematic phase lag variation between two robotic insect wings J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2004; 207(26): 4707 - 4726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L. R. Thomas, G. K. Taylor, R. B. Srygley, R. L. Nudds, and R. J. Bomphrey Dragonfly flight: free-flight and tethered flow visualizations reveal a diverse array of unsteady lift-generating mechanisms, controlled primarily via angle of attack J. Exp. Biol., November 15, 2004; 207(24): 4299 - 4323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Sane The aerodynamics of insect flight J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4191 - 4208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. K. Taylor and A. L. R. Thomas Dynamic flight stability in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2003; 206(16): 2803 - 2829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Sane and M. H. Dickinson The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 2001; 204(15): 2607 - 2626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kesel Aerodynamic characteristics of dragonfly wing sections compared with technical aerofoils J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2000; 203(20): 3125 - 3135. [Abstract]

				R. J. Wootton, J. Kukalová-Peck, D. J. Newman, and J. Muzón Smart Engineering in the Mid-Carboniferous: How Well Could Palaeozoic Dragonflies Fly? Science, October 23, 1998; 282(5389): 749 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text]