QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LAUGHLIN, S. B. Articles by OSORIO, D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by LAUGHLIN, S. B. Articles by OSORIO, D.

Journal of Experimental Biology 144,113-146 (1989)
Published by Company of Biologists 1989

Mechanisms for Neural Signal Enhancement in the Blowfly Compound Eye

SIMON B. LAUGHLIN ¹ and DANIEL OSORIO ²

¹ Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
² Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England; Visual Sciences Centre, RSBS, Australian National University, PO Box 475, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia

In the blowfly Calliphora vicina visual signals are enhanced by amplification and antagonism as they pass from the site of phototransduction in the retina to secondorder neurones (LMCs) in the first optic neuropile, the lamina. The mechanisms responsible for amplification and antagonism were investigated, using currentclamp techniques, to examine the conductance mechanisms generating LMC responses. LMCs responded Ohmically to injected current. Voltage-sensitive conductances and feedback mechanisms driven by the potential of a single LMC played a minor role in shaping responses. The LMCs response to an increment in illumination, a transient hyperpolarization, was generated by a large and transient conductance increase with a reversal potential close to the maximum response amplitude (30-40mV below dark resting potential). The depolarization of the C in response to a decrement in light intensity was partially generated by a reduction in direct synaptic input from the photoreceptors. Changes in depolarizing conductances with positive reversal potentials played a secondary role, contributing to large-amplitude responses to dimming or light-off, and to the slow decay of the LMC response to steady illumination. Antagonism, including lateral antagonism, operated principally by shutting down the direct photoreceptor input, presumably by presynaptic regulation. The results of dye injection suggested that the identified large monopolar cell L2 is more strongly affected by lateral antagonism than the similar cells L1 and L3. We conclude that LMCs are essentially passive integrators of a well-regulated direct input from the photoreceptors. This suggests that the intrinsic properties of photoreceptor-LMC synapses and presynaptic interactions are primarily responsible for amplification and antagonism.

Key words: vision, blowfly, synaptic mechanism, lateral inhibition

Accepted on March 17, 1989

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Balys and E. Pyza Localization of the clock controlling circadian rhythms in the first neuropile of the optic lobe in the housefly J. Exp. Biol., January 10, 2001; 204(19): 3303 - 3310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. O. Uusitalo and M. Weckstrom Potentiation in the First Visual Synapse of the Fly Compound Eye J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2000; 83(4): 2103 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Glantz, C. S. Miller, and D. R. Nassel Tachykinin-Related Peptide and GABA-Mediated Presynaptic Inhibition of Crayfish Photoreceptors J. Neurosci., March 1, 2000; 20(5): 1780 - 1790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]