spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ENNOS, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by WOOTTON, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ENNOS, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by WOOTTON, R. J.
Journal of Experimental Biology 143,267-284 (1989)
Published by Company of Biologists 1989


FUNCTIONAL WING MORPHOLOGY AND AERODYNAMICS OF PANORPA GERMANICA (INSECTA: MECOPTERA)

A. ROLAND ENNOS 1 and ROBIN J. WOOTTON 2

1 Department of Biological Sciences, Hatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS; Present address: Department of Biological Science, University of York, Heslington, York YO1 5DD
2 Department of Biological Sciences, Hatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS

The functional wing morphology of the wings of the scorpion fly Panorpa germanica L. was investigated using a combination of light microscopy, high-speed cinematography, wing manipulation and mechanical testing

In rising forward flight the wings are flapped 40° out of phase along a shallow stroke plane, the forewings leading. Aerodynamic analysis suggests that unsteady effects are important in flight

During the downstroke, both wings are straight and cambered, the chord being parallel to the body axis, which is angled 45° upwards from horizontal. Both wings are supinated at lower stroke reversal, the hindwing to a much greater extent, and flex ventrally halfway along their length for the first half of the upstroke. Flexion is parallel to the chord in the hindwing, but is oblique in the forewing, so distal forewing areas are supinated relative to proximal areas

The behaviour of the wings is related to their structure. Spars at the leading and trailing edges of both wings support the wing during the downstroke, and flexion during the upstroke is facilitated by buckling of the weak ventral thyridium region. The oblique flexion seen in the forewing is due to its relatively longer leading edge spar

The differences between the wings are, in turn, related to their pitch control mechanisms. The forewing has a well-developed clavus, like that of the forewing of a locust, and pitch is altered by relative movement of this and the leading edge, but only within a narrow range. Oblique flexion is necessary to invert the aerofoil. The weaker and less well-developed clavus of the hindwing, more similar to that of the Diptera, allows a greater degree of supination, effected largely by wing inertia. No oblique flexion is necessary

Key words: flight, wing, aerodynamics, structure, Panorpa

Accepted on January 25, 1989




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. A. Combes and T. L. Daniel
Flexural stiffness in insect wings II. Spatial distribution and dynamic wing bending
J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 2989 - 2997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. Wootton
Invertebrate paraxial locomotory appendages: design, deformation and control
J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(23): 3333 - 3345.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1989