spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anapol, F.
Right arrow Articles by Herring, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anapol, F.
Right arrow Articles by Herring, S. W.

Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol 143, Issue 1 1-16, Copyright © 1989 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Length-tension relationships of masseter and digastric muscles of miniature swine during ontogeny

F Anapol and SW Herring
Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Liverpool, UK.

At incremental whole muscle lengths, active isometric and passive elastic forces were recorded from the masseter and digastric muscles of anaesthetized miniature pigs (Hanford) weighing 2.0-20.0 kg. Wet muscle mass and maximum tetanic tension values for masseter exceed those for digastric and increase more rapidly with body mass (age). At any body mass, masseter exceeds digastric in the ratio of optimum length (that length at which maximum tetanic tension is produced) to in situ muscle length (that length which corresponds to the jaw in a closed position) and the proportion of passive tension comprising total (passive plus active) tension. Passive elastic tension begins to rise in masseter at lengths as short as 87% of optimum (in younger pigs). In digastric, passive tension is absent until the muscle is stretched to a length slightly longer than optimum in younger pigs but occurs at shorter lengths in older pigs. Contractile properties explain functional differences between masseter and digastric more clearly than they explain ontogenetic changes in either muscle. The behavioural transition from infant suckling to adult mastication of solid food is best characterized by a disproportionate increase in mass (and force) of the masseter, relative to digastric, and increased reliance upon active (rather than passive) tension.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
C. J. Vinyard and B. A. Payseur
Of "mice" and mammals: utilizing classical inbred mice to study the genetic architecture of function and performance in mammals
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 24, 2008; (2008) icn063v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
S. W. Herring, S. C. Pedersen, and X. Huang
Ontogeny of bone strain: the zygomatic arch in pigs
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2005; 208(23): 4509 - 4521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1989