QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by ENNOS, A. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by ENNOS, A. R.

Journal of Experimental Biology 142,87-95 (1989)
Published by Company of Biologists 1989

INERTIAL AND AERODYNAMIC TORQUES ON THE WINGS OF DIPTERA IN FLIGHT

A. ROLAND ENNOS ¹

¹ Department of Biological Sciences, Hatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS; Department of Biological Science, University of York, Heslington, York YO1 5DD

1. The magnitude and distribution of the torques caused by inertial and aerodynamic forces on the wings of Diptera in flight are calculated.

2. The bending torque at stroke reversal due to the inertia of the virtual mass of air bound to the wing is only slightly less than the torque due to the inertia of the wing mass itself. The maximum inertial torque due to both wing mass and virtual mass is usually slightly greater than the maximum aerodynamic torque encountered by the wings.

3. Bending torques decrease rapidly away from the wing base.

4. Pitching torques are much smaller than bending torques at the wing base, but do not decrease much until near the tip.

5. The pattern of loading affects the wing design. Wings are thicker nearer the base to resist bending, but thin and light near the tip to minimize inertial energy expenditure. Their open, corrugated structure resists bending, while allowing them to be twisted as a result of the weak pitching moments.

Key words: Diptera, wing, flight, bending, torsion

Accepted on September 5, 1988

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. J. Borrell, J. A. Goldbogen, and R. Dudley Aquatic wing flapping at low Reynolds numbers: swimming kinematics of the Antarctic pteropod, Clione antarctica J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2005; 208(15): 2939 - 2949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Sane The aerodynamics of insect flight J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4191 - 4208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Combes and T. L. Daniel Flexural stiffness in insect wings I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 2979 - 2987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Combes and T. L. Daniel Flexural stiffness in insect wings II. Spatial distribution and dynamic wing bending J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 2989 - 2997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Combes and T. L. Daniel Into thin air: contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 2999 - 3006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Wootton, J. Kukalová-Peck, D. J. Newman, and J. Muzón Smart Engineering in the Mid-Carboniferous: How Well Could Palaeozoic Dragonflies Fly? Science, October 23, 1998; 282(5389): 749 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text]