QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by ENNOS, A. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by ENNOS, A. R.

Journal of Experimental Biology 142,49-85 (1989)
Published by Company of Biologists 1989

The Kinematics an Daerodynamics of the Free Flight of some Diptera

A. ROLAND ENNOS ¹

¹ Department of Biological Sciences, Hatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS; Department of Biological Science, University of York, Heslington, York, YO1 5DD.

Seven representative species of the order Diptera were filmed in free flight using high-speed cinematography. Insects were killed after filming, and morphological measurements were made in the manner of Ellington (1984b).

The detailed kinematics of selected sequences were then found using frame-by-frame digitization, followed by computer reconstruction of the third dimension. Kinematics were qualitatively similar to those observed by Ellington (1984c), though in three species the wings often underwent ventral flexion near the base at the end of the downstroke.

For aerodynamic analysis of hovering flight, modified forms of the equations of Ellington (1984e,f) were used. Forward flight was analysed by a novel method, which assumes that an equal but opposite circulation is built up for each half-stroke and allows linear equations to be used.

The lift coefficients calculated for hovering were commonly well above those possible by quasi-steady mechanisms, but rotational coefficients were within those that could be achieved by the unsteady lift mechanisms: clap-and-fling (Weis-Fogh, 1973) and flex (Ellington, 1984d). The lift and rotational coefficients of the two half-strokes were often unequal.

In forward flight, the equal circulation assumption often led to an incorrect estimation of the aerodynamic force vector, showing that the circulations during the two half-strokes were unequal.

It is suggested that flies manoeuvre largely by altering the unsteady circulations produced at stroke reversal via alterations in the speed and timing of wing rotation. The differences in the mechanisms used by different fly species are related to their flight behaviour in the field.

Key words: Diptera, flight, kinematics, aerodynamics

Accepted on September 26, 1988

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Mronz and F.-O. Lehmann The free-flight response of Drosophila to motion of the visual environment J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 211(13): 2026 - 2045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. J. Wang Aerodynamic efficiency of flapping flight: analysis of a two-stroke model J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2008; 211(2): 234 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F.-O. Lehmann and S. Pick The aerodynamic benefit of wing-wing interaction depends on stroke trajectory in flapping insect wings J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1362 - 1377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. C. Golding, M. Edmunds, and A. R. Ennos Flight behaviour during foraging of the social wasp Vespula vulgaris (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) and four mimetic hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) Sericomyia silentis, Myathropa florea, Helophilus sp. and Syrphus sp. J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2005; 208(23): 4523 - 4527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F.-O. Lehmann, S. P. Sane, and M. Dickinson The aerodynamic effects of wing-wing interaction in flapping insect wings J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2005; 208(16): 3075 - 3092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. N. Fry, R. Sayaman, and M. H. Dickinson The aerodynamics of hovering flight in Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2005; 208(12): 2303 - 2318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Maybury and F.-O. Lehmann The fluid dynamics of flight control by kinematic phase lag variation between two robotic insect wings J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2004; 207(26): 4707 - 4726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. N. Balint and M. H. Dickinson Neuromuscular control of aerodynamic forces and moments in the blowfly, Calliphora vicina J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2004; 207(22): 3813 - 3838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Wu and M. Sun Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flapping wing J. Exp. Biol., March 1, 2004; 207(7): 1137 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Roberts, J. F. Harrison, and R. Dudley Allometry of kinematics and energetics in carpenter bees (Xylocopa varipuncta) hovering in variable-density gases J. Exp. Biol., February 22, 2004; 207(6): 993 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Sane The aerodynamics of insect flight J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2003; 206(23): 4191 - 4208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sun and J. H. Wu Aerodynamic force generation and power requirements in forward flight in a fruit fly with modeled wing motion J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 3065 - 3083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Wang, L. Zeng, H. Liu, and C. Yin Measuring wing kinematics, flight trajectory and body attitude during forward flight and turning maneuvers in dragonflies J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2003; 206(4): 745 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sun and J. Tang Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila virilis J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2002; 205(16): 2413 - 2427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Usherwood and C. P. Ellington The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2002; 205(11): 1547 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Walker Functional Morphology and Virtual Models: Physical Constraints on the Design of Oscillating Wings, Fins, Legs, and Feet at Intermediate Reynolds Numbers Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2002; 42(2): 232 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Dudley Mechanisms and Implications of Animal Flight Maneuverability Integr. Comp. Biol., February 1, 2002; 42(1): 135 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Sane and M. H. Dickinson The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production J. Exp. Biol., January 8, 2001; 204(15): 2607 - 2626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Lehmann and M. Dickinson The production of elevated flight force compromises manoeuvrability in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2001; 204(4): 627 - 635. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Golding, A. Ennos, and M Edmunds Similarity in flight behaviour between the honeybee Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: apidae) and its presumed mimic, the dronefly Eristalis tenax (Diptera: syrphidae) J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2001; 204(1): 139 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. H. Dickinson, F. Lehmann, and S. P. Sane Wing Rotation and the Aerodynamic Basis of Insect Flight Science, June 18, 1999; 284(5422): 1954 - 1960. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. Ellington The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: applications to micro-air vehicles J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 1999; 202(23): 3439 - 3448. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C Schilstra and J. Hateren Blowfly flight and optic flow. I. Thorax kinematics and flight dynamics J. Exp. Biol., January 6, 1999; 202(11): 1481 - 1490. [Abstract] [PDF]