spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PANKHURST, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by MONTGOMERY, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PANKHURST, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by MONTGOMERY, J. C.
Journal of Experimental Biology 142,311-324 (1989)
Published by Company of Biologists 1989


Visual Function in Four Antarctic Nototheniid Fishes

N. W. PANKHURST 1 and J. C. MONTGOMERY 2

1 Leigh Marine Laboratory, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland, New Zealand
2 Department of Zoology, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland, New Zealand

Visual function was investigated in the antarctic fish Pagothenia borchgrevinki (Boulenger), Trematomus bernacchii Boulenger, T. centronotus Regan and T. hansoni Boulenger. All Trematomus species have large anterior aphakic spaces (indicating a forward feeding vector), whereas Pagothenia does not. Pagothenia and T. hansoni, which both feed in the water column, lack the corneal iridescence displayed by T. bernacchii and T. centronotus. This is thought to relate to the importance of downwelling light for image formation in Pagothenia and T. hansoni. Absolute sensitivity thresholds to white and monochromatic light were measured using electroretinogram (ERG) responses in light- and dark-adapted Pagothenia and dark-adapted Trematomus species. Dark-adapted fish (retinal screening pigment withdrawn from rod outer segments) had thresholds of l.3x10-3µEm-2s-1 to a 200ms pulse of white light, whereas that of lightadapted Pagothenia (rod outer segments covered by the retinal screening pigment) was l.9x10-2µEm-2s-1. We suggest that the thresholds approximate threshold stimuli for rods and cones, respectively. Measurement of thresholds of light-adapted Pagothenia made using a behavioural measure (feeding responses) gave a threshold of 5x10-3µEm-2s-1. Limits for photopic and scotopic vision are predicted to be reached at depths of 20-40 and 30-60 m, respectively, under snow and ice conditions typically encountered at this time of year. ERG-determined spectral sensitivity curves peaked around 500 nm in all four species and matched the spectral irradiance under the ice. Shifts to longer wavelengths in spectral irradiance caused by sub-ice phytoplankton growth may degrade visual ability. Flicker fusion frequencies (FFFs) reached a maximum value of 15 Hz in Pagothenia at the maximum stimulus intensity used, but at environmentally realistic light intensities they were less than 8 Hz. FFFs were lower in all Trematomus species than in Pagothenia.

Key words: fish vision, antarctic fish, Pagothenia, Trematomus, Nototheniidae

Accepted on November 14, 1988




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. A. Pointer, C.-H. C. Cheng, J. K. Bowmaker, J. W. L. Parry, N. Soto, G. Jeffery, J. A. Cowing, and D. M. Hunt
Adaptations to an extreme environment: retinal organisation and spectral properties of photoreceptors in Antarctic notothenioid fish
J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2005; 208(12): 2363 - 2376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1989