spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by STEPHENSON, R.
Right arrow Articles by BUTLER, P.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by STEPHENSON, R.
Right arrow Articles by BUTLER, P.J.
Journal of Experimental Biology 141,265-275 (1989)
Published by Company of Biologists 1989


The Relationship Between Diving Activity and Oxygen Storage Capacity in the Tufted Duck (Aythya Fuligula)

R. STEPHENSON 1, D.L. TURNER 2, and P.J. BUTLER 3

1 Department of Zoology and Comparative Physiology, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Department of Zoology, The Univeristy of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 2A9
2 Department of Zoology and Comparative Physiology, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Institute of Anatomy, The University of Bern, Buhlstrasse 26, CH 3012 Bern, Switzerland
3 Department of Zoology and Comparative Physiology, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

For a period of 6 months, a group of eight tufted ducks (‘control’ ducks) were kept on a shallow outdoor pond and performed short dives to obtain food (maximum depth, 0.65 m; observed mean duration, 10.9 ± 0.54s). At the same time, a group of seven tufted ducks (‘dive-trained’ ducks) were kept on an adjacent deeper and partly covered pond, and performed ‘extended’ dives under the surface mesh in order to feed (maximum distance to food, 10m; observed mean dive distance, 6.0 ± 0.25 m; observed mean duration, 24.8 ± 0.58 s). At the end of this time, the calculated total usable oxygen store was approximately the same in control and dive-trained ducks (44 and 42mlO2STPDkg-1, respectively), although the relative quantities of usable oxygen in each of the three main storage sites (respiratory system, blood and skeletal muscle) differed between groups.

The end-expiratory lung/air sac volume was found to be significantly smaller (P<0.01) in the dive-trained ducks (165mlBTPskg-1) than in the control ducks (232mlBTPs-1). The dive-trained ducks, however, had a significantly greater (P<001) blood volume (141mlkg-1) than the control ducks (lO7mlkg-1), although the blood oxygen capacity and several haematological indices (measured haemoglobin content, red blood cell count and haematocrit, and calculated mean corpuscular haemoglobin and mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration) were statistically the same in both groups. Mean corpuscular volume was significantly greater (P<0.05) in the dive-trained ducks. The myoglobin content of the myocardium was the same in both groups. The pectoralis muscle and the locomotory leg muscles, however, contained significantly higher concentrations of myoglobin in the dive-trained ducks than in the control ducks (pectoralis, P<0.05; lateral gastrocnemius and semitendinosus, P<0.01 )<001).

It is suggested that the anatomical adaptations which occur in response to chronic increases in diving activity may increase the aerobic diving capacity of the tufted duck by effecting a decrease in buoyancy (reduced end-expiratory lung/air sac volume) and an increase in blood oxygen storage capacity (hypervolaemia). Locomotory muscle function may be maintained in the face of decreasing oxygen delivery during extended dives by means of increased myoglobin content after dive-training.

Key words: oxygen stores, diving, tufted duck

Accepted on June 20, 1988




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. J. Weise and D. P. Costa
Total body oxygen stores and physiological diving capacity of California sea lions as a function of sex and age
J. Exp. Biol., January 15, 2007; 210(2): 278 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. A. Green, I. L. Boyd, A. J. Woakes, C. J. Green, and P. J. Butler
Do seasonal changes in metabolic rate facilitate changes in diving behaviour?
J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2005; 208(13): 2581 - 2593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. P. Wilson and F. Quintana
Surface pauses in relation to dive duration in imperial cormorants; how much time for a breather?
J. Exp. Biol., May 1, 2004; 207(11): 1789 - 1796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
R. A. MacArthur, G. L. Weseen, and K. L. Campbell
Diving experience and the aerobic dive capacity of muskrats: does training produce a better diver?
J. Exp. Biol., April 1, 2003; 206(7): 1153 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. A. Green, P. J. Butler, A. J. Woakes, and I. L. Boyd
Energetics of diving in macaroni penguins
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2003; 206(1): 43 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
D. Gremillet and R. P. Wilson
A life in the fast lane: energetics and foraging strategies of the great cormorant
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 1999; 10(5): 516 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Lovvorn, D. Croll, and G. Liggins
Mechanical versus physiological determinants of swimming speeds in diving Brunnich's guillemots
J. Exp. Biol., January 7, 1999; 202(13): 1741 - 1752.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
M. Dolar, P Suarez, P. Ponganis, and G. Kooyman
Myoglobin in pelagic small cetaceans
J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 1999; 202(3): 227 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1989